<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday&#8217;s Tip: Software Licensing and Pricing &#8211; Now&#8217;s The Time To Remove &#8220;Gag Rule&#8221; Clauses In Your Software Contracts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/</link>
	<description>Your buy side advocate for enterprise apps strategies, vendor selection, &#38; contract negotiations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:41:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ITAM Review &#187; ITAM Industry News Round-Up</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-4818</link>
		<dc:creator>ITAM Review &#187; ITAM Industry News Round-Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=1248#comment-4818</guid>
		<description>[...] Software Insider &#8211; R &#8220;Ray&#8221; Wang&#8217;s Blog An article showing some of the gag clauses used by software vendors in their agreements.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Software Insider &#8211; R &#8220;Ray&#8221; Wang&#8217;s Blog An article showing some of the gag clauses used by software vendors in their agreements.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David A. Freedman, at Insource Training</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>David A. Freedman, at Insource Training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=1248#comment-484</guid>
		<description>I was intrigued by your question: &lt;blockquote cite=&quot;Has your software vendor put a gag order on your ability to seek help?&quot;&gt; 
&lt;cite&gt; 

It begs the question of whether you are &lt;strong&gt;allowed&lt;/strong&gt; to even reveal that fact -- and it happened to me!

In a contract negotiation with a very large software firm (no tattle-tale-ing here, but they are based in Israel and the name starts with &quot;A&quot;), I noticed an interesting confidentiality clause.

Basically, it stated that I was not allowed to reveal the very &lt;strong&gt;existence&lt;/strong&gt; of the entire contract!

Other provisions of the contract blocked me from &quot;exhibiting&quot; (in the legal sense) any of the work products -- course exercises, slides etc. -- which meant that I could not show examples of my good work to a prospective new client.

Fair enough, but of course I would tell the new client &quot;No, sorry, but I can&#039;t show you that material.  The contract with A----- precludes that&quot;.

&quot;No,&quot; said the lawyer, &quot;you can&#039;t say that.  The existence of a relationship between your company and A----- is confidential.&quot;

&quot;So what do I say when they ask why they can&#039;t see samples of my work for A-----?&quot;

&quot;You say nothing.&quot;

Needless to say, I asked for and received permission to strike the &quot;the existence of this contract is a secret&quot; clause.  And the Comedy of the Absurd was concluded, at least for that performance.

Tell me, do lawyers actually get &lt;strong&gt;paid&lt;/strong&gt; to write that stuff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was intrigued by your question:<br />
<blockquote cite="Has your software vendor put a gag order on your ability to seek help?">
<cite> </p>
<p>It begs the question of whether you are <strong>allowed</strong> to even reveal that fact &#8212; and it happened to me!</p>
<p>In a contract negotiation with a very large software firm (no tattle-tale-ing here, but they are based in Israel and the name starts with &#8220;A&#8221;), I noticed an interesting confidentiality clause.</p>
<p>Basically, it stated that I was not allowed to reveal the very <strong>existence</strong> of the entire contract!</p>
<p>Other provisions of the contract blocked me from &#8220;exhibiting&#8221; (in the legal sense) any of the work products &#8212; course exercises, slides etc. &#8212; which meant that I could not show examples of my good work to a prospective new client.</p>
<p>Fair enough, but of course I would tell the new client &#8220;No, sorry, but I can&#8217;t show you that material.  The contract with A&#8212;&#8211; precludes that&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;No,&#8221; said the lawyer, &#8220;you can&#8217;t say that.  The existence of a relationship between your company and A&#8212;&#8211; is confidential.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;So what do I say when they ask why they can&#8217;t see samples of my work for A&#8212;&#8211;?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;You say nothing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Needless to say, I asked for and received permission to strike the &#8220;the existence of this contract is a secret&#8221; clause.  And the Comedy of the Absurd was concluded, at least for that performance.</p>
<p>Tell me, do lawyers actually get <strong>paid</strong> to write that stuff?</cite></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinnie mirchandani</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>vinnie mirchandani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=1248#comment-437</guid>
		<description>Ray, thanks for highlighting the issue, my POV and that of an attorney below:

http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2009/02/the-gag-rule-in-tech-contracts.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray, thanks for highlighting the issue, my POV and that of an attorney below:</p>
<p><a href="http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2009/02/the-gag-rule-in-tech-contracts.html" rel="nofollow">http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2009/02/the-gag-rule-in-tech-contracts.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James MacLennan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/</link>
	<description>Your buy side advocate for enterprise apps strategies, vendor selection, &#38; contract negotiations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:41:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comments on: Tuesday&#8217;s Tip: Software Licensing and Pricing &#8211; Now&#8217;s The Time To Remove &#8220;Gag Rule&#8221; Clauses In Your Software Contracts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/</link>
	<description>Your buy side advocate for enterprise apps strategies, vendor selection, &#38; contract negotiations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:41:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ITAM Review &#187; ITAM Industry News Round-Up</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-4818</link>
		<dc:creator>ITAM Review &#187; ITAM Industry News Round-Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=1248#comment-4818</guid>
		<description>[...] Software Insider &#8211; R &#8220;Ray&#8221; Wang&#8217;s Blog An article showing some of the gag clauses used by software vendors in their agreements.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Software Insider &#8211; R &#8220;Ray&#8221; Wang&#8217;s Blog An article showing some of the gag clauses used by software vendors in their agreements.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David A. Freedman, at Insource Training</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>David A. Freedman, at Insource Training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=1248#comment-484</guid>
		<description>I was intrigued by your question: &lt;blockquote cite=&quot;Has your software vendor put a gag order on your ability to seek help?&quot;&gt; 
&lt;cite&gt; 

It begs the question of whether you are &lt;strong&gt;allowed&lt;/strong&gt; to even reveal that fact -- and it happened to me!

In a contract negotiation with a very large software firm (no tattle-tale-ing here, but they are based in Israel and the name starts with &quot;A&quot;), I noticed an interesting confidentiality clause.

Basically, it stated that I was not allowed to reveal the very &lt;strong&gt;existence&lt;/strong&gt; of the entire contract!

Other provisions of the contract blocked me from &quot;exhibiting&quot; (in the legal sense) any of the work products -- course exercises, slides etc. -- which meant that I could not show examples of my good work to a prospective new client.

Fair enough, but of course I would tell the new client &quot;No, sorry, but I can&#039;t show you that material.  The contract with A----- precludes that&quot;.

&quot;No,&quot; said the lawyer, &quot;you can&#039;t say that.  The existence of a relationship between your company and A----- is confidential.&quot;

&quot;So what do I say when they ask why they can&#039;t see samples of my work for A-----?&quot;

&quot;You say nothing.&quot;

Needless to say, I asked for and received permission to strike the &quot;the existence of this contract is a secret&quot; clause.  And the Comedy of the Absurd was concluded, at least for that performance.

Tell me, do lawyers actually get &lt;strong&gt;paid&lt;/strong&gt; to write that stuff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was intrigued by your question:<br />
<blockquote cite="Has your software vendor put a gag order on your ability to seek help?">
<cite> </p>
<p>It begs the question of whether you are <strong>allowed</strong> to even reveal that fact &#8212; and it happened to me!</p>
<p>In a contract negotiation with a very large software firm (no tattle-tale-ing here, but they are based in Israel and the name starts with &#8220;A&#8221;), I noticed an interesting confidentiality clause.</p>
<p>Basically, it stated that I was not allowed to reveal the very <strong>existence</strong> of the entire contract!</p>
<p>Other provisions of the contract blocked me from &#8220;exhibiting&#8221; (in the legal sense) any of the work products &#8212; course exercises, slides etc. &#8212; which meant that I could not show examples of my good work to a prospective new client.</p>
<p>Fair enough, but of course I would tell the new client &#8220;No, sorry, but I can&#8217;t show you that material.  The contract with A&#8212;&#8211; precludes that&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;No,&#8221; said the lawyer, &#8220;you can&#8217;t say that.  The existence of a relationship between your company and A&#8212;&#8211; is confidential.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;So what do I say when they ask why they can&#8217;t see samples of my work for A&#8212;&#8211;?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;You say nothing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Needless to say, I asked for and received permission to strike the &#8220;the existence of this contract is a secret&#8221; clause.  And the Comedy of the Absurd was concluded, at least for that performance.</p>
<p>Tell me, do lawyers actually get <strong>paid</strong> to write that stuff?</cite></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinnie mirchandani</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>vinnie mirchandani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=1248#comment-437</guid>
		<description>Ray, thanks for highlighting the issue, my POV and that of an attorney below:

http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2009/02/the-gag-rule-in-tech-contracts.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray, thanks for highlighting the issue, my POV and that of an attorney below:</p>
<p><a href="http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2009/02/the-gag-rule-in-tech-contracts.html" rel="nofollow">http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2009/02/the-gag-rule-in-tech-contracts.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James MacLennan</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-4818</link>
		<dc:creator>ITAM Review &#187; ITAM Industry News Round-Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=1248#comment-4818</guid>
		<description>[...] Software Insider &#8211; R &#8220;Ray&#8221; Wang&#8217;s Blog An article showing some of the gag clauses used by software vendors in their agreements.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Software Insider &#8211; R &#8220;Ray&#8221; Wang&#8217;s Blog An article showing some of the gag clauses used by software vendors in their agreements.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Tuesday&#8217;s Tip: Software Licensing and Pricing &#8211; Now&#8217;s The Time To Remove &#8220;Gag Rule&#8221; Clauses In Your Software Contracts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/</link>
	<description>Your buy side advocate for enterprise apps strategies, vendor selection, &#38; contract negotiations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:41:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ITAM Review &#187; ITAM Industry News Round-Up</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-4818</link>
		<dc:creator>ITAM Review &#187; ITAM Industry News Round-Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=1248#comment-4818</guid>
		<description>[...] Software Insider &#8211; R &#8220;Ray&#8221; Wang&#8217;s Blog An article showing some of the gag clauses used by software vendors in their agreements.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Software Insider &#8211; R &#8220;Ray&#8221; Wang&#8217;s Blog An article showing some of the gag clauses used by software vendors in their agreements.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David A. Freedman, at Insource Training</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>David A. Freedman, at Insource Training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=1248#comment-484</guid>
		<description>I was intrigued by your question: &lt;blockquote cite=&quot;Has your software vendor put a gag order on your ability to seek help?&quot;&gt; 
&lt;cite&gt; 

It begs the question of whether you are &lt;strong&gt;allowed&lt;/strong&gt; to even reveal that fact -- and it happened to me!

In a contract negotiation with a very large software firm (no tattle-tale-ing here, but they are based in Israel and the name starts with &quot;A&quot;), I noticed an interesting confidentiality clause.

Basically, it stated that I was not allowed to reveal the very &lt;strong&gt;existence&lt;/strong&gt; of the entire contract!

Other provisions of the contract blocked me from &quot;exhibiting&quot; (in the legal sense) any of the work products -- course exercises, slides etc. -- which meant that I could not show examples of my good work to a prospective new client.

Fair enough, but of course I would tell the new client &quot;No, sorry, but I can&#039;t show you that material.  The contract with A----- precludes that&quot;.

&quot;No,&quot; said the lawyer, &quot;you can&#039;t say that.  The existence of a relationship between your company and A----- is confidential.&quot;

&quot;So what do I say when they ask why they can&#039;t see samples of my work for A-----?&quot;

&quot;You say nothing.&quot;

Needless to say, I asked for and received permission to strike the &quot;the existence of this contract is a secret&quot; clause.  And the Comedy of the Absurd was concluded, at least for that performance.

Tell me, do lawyers actually get &lt;strong&gt;paid&lt;/strong&gt; to write that stuff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was intrigued by your question:<br />
<blockquote cite="Has your software vendor put a gag order on your ability to seek help?">
<cite> </p>
<p>It begs the question of whether you are <strong>allowed</strong> to even reveal that fact &#8212; and it happened to me!</p>
<p>In a contract negotiation with a very large software firm (no tattle-tale-ing here, but they are based in Israel and the name starts with &#8220;A&#8221;), I noticed an interesting confidentiality clause.</p>
<p>Basically, it stated that I was not allowed to reveal the very <strong>existence</strong> of the entire contract!</p>
<p>Other provisions of the contract blocked me from &#8220;exhibiting&#8221; (in the legal sense) any of the work products &#8212; course exercises, slides etc. &#8212; which meant that I could not show examples of my good work to a prospective new client.</p>
<p>Fair enough, but of course I would tell the new client &#8220;No, sorry, but I can&#8217;t show you that material.  The contract with A&#8212;&#8211; precludes that&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;No,&#8221; said the lawyer, &#8220;you can&#8217;t say that.  The existence of a relationship between your company and A&#8212;&#8211; is confidential.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;So what do I say when they ask why they can&#8217;t see samples of my work for A&#8212;&#8211;?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;You say nothing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Needless to say, I asked for and received permission to strike the &#8220;the existence of this contract is a secret&#8221; clause.  And the Comedy of the Absurd was concluded, at least for that performance.</p>
<p>Tell me, do lawyers actually get <strong>paid</strong> to write that stuff?</cite></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinnie mirchandani</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>vinnie mirchandani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=1248#comment-437</guid>
		<description>Ray, thanks for highlighting the issue, my POV and that of an attorney below:

http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2009/02/the-gag-rule-in-tech-contracts.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray, thanks for highlighting the issue, my POV and that of an attorney below:</p>
<p><a href="http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2009/02/the-gag-rule-in-tech-contracts.html" rel="nofollow">http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2009/02/the-gag-rule-in-tech-contracts.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James MacLennan</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>David A. Freedman, at Insource Training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=1248#comment-484</guid>
		<description>I was intrigued by your question: &lt;blockquote cite=&quot;Has your software vendor put a gag order on your ability to seek help?&quot;&gt; 
&lt;cite&gt; 

It begs the question of whether you are &lt;strong&gt;allowed&lt;/strong&gt; to even reveal that fact -- and it happened to me!

In a contract negotiation with a very large software firm (no tattle-tale-ing here, but they are based in Israel and the name starts with &quot;A&quot;), I noticed an interesting confidentiality clause.

Basically, it stated that I was not allowed to reveal the very &lt;strong&gt;existence&lt;/strong&gt; of the entire contract!

Other provisions of the contract blocked me from &quot;exhibiting&quot; (in the legal sense) any of the work products -- course exercises, slides etc. -- which meant that I could not show examples of my good work to a prospective new client.

Fair enough, but of course I would tell the new client &quot;No, sorry, but I can&#039;t show you that material.  The contract with A----- precludes that&quot;.

&quot;No,&quot; said the lawyer, &quot;you can&#039;t say that.  The existence of a relationship between your company and A----- is confidential.&quot;

&quot;So what do I say when they ask why they can&#039;t see samples of my work for A-----?&quot;

&quot;You say nothing.&quot;

Needless to say, I asked for and received permission to strike the &quot;the existence of this contract is a secret&quot; clause.  And the Comedy of the Absurd was concluded, at least for that performance.

Tell me, do lawyers actually get &lt;strong&gt;paid&lt;/strong&gt; to write that stuff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was intrigued by your question:<br />
<blockquote cite="Has your software vendor put a gag order on your ability to seek help?">
<cite> </p>
<p>It begs the question of whether you are <strong>allowed</strong> to even reveal that fact &#8212; and it happened to me!</p>
<p>In a contract negotiation with a very large software firm (no tattle-tale-ing here, but they are based in Israel and the name starts with &#8220;A&#8221;), I noticed an interesting confidentiality clause.</p>
<p>Basically, it stated that I was not allowed to reveal the very <strong>existence</strong> of the entire contract!</p>
<p>Other provisions of the contract blocked me from &#8220;exhibiting&#8221; (in the legal sense) any of the work products &#8212; course exercises, slides etc. &#8212; which meant that I could not show examples of my good work to a prospective new client.</p>
<p>Fair enough, but of course I would tell the new client &#8220;No, sorry, but I can&#8217;t show you that material.  The contract with A&#8212;&#8211; precludes that&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;No,&#8221; said the lawyer, &#8220;you can&#8217;t say that.  The existence of a relationship between your company and A&#8212;&#8211; is confidential.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;So what do I say when they ask why they can&#8217;t see samples of my work for A&#8212;&#8211;?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;You say nothing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Needless to say, I asked for and received permission to strike the &#8220;the existence of this contract is a secret&#8221; clause.  And the Comedy of the Absurd was concluded, at least for that performance.</p>
<p>Tell me, do lawyers actually get <strong>paid</strong> to write that stuff?</cite></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Tuesday&#8217;s Tip: Software Licensing and Pricing &#8211; Now&#8217;s The Time To Remove &#8220;Gag Rule&#8221; Clauses In Your Software Contracts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/</link>
	<description>Your buy side advocate for enterprise apps strategies, vendor selection, &#38; contract negotiations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:41:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ITAM Review &#187; ITAM Industry News Round-Up</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-4818</link>
		<dc:creator>ITAM Review &#187; ITAM Industry News Round-Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=1248#comment-4818</guid>
		<description>[...] Software Insider &#8211; R &#8220;Ray&#8221; Wang&#8217;s Blog An article showing some of the gag clauses used by software vendors in their agreements.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Software Insider &#8211; R &#8220;Ray&#8221; Wang&#8217;s Blog An article showing some of the gag clauses used by software vendors in their agreements.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David A. Freedman, at Insource Training</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>David A. Freedman, at Insource Training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=1248#comment-484</guid>
		<description>I was intrigued by your question: &lt;blockquote cite=&quot;Has your software vendor put a gag order on your ability to seek help?&quot;&gt; 
&lt;cite&gt; 

It begs the question of whether you are &lt;strong&gt;allowed&lt;/strong&gt; to even reveal that fact -- and it happened to me!

In a contract negotiation with a very large software firm (no tattle-tale-ing here, but they are based in Israel and the name starts with &quot;A&quot;), I noticed an interesting confidentiality clause.

Basically, it stated that I was not allowed to reveal the very &lt;strong&gt;existence&lt;/strong&gt; of the entire contract!

Other provisions of the contract blocked me from &quot;exhibiting&quot; (in the legal sense) any of the work products -- course exercises, slides etc. -- which meant that I could not show examples of my good work to a prospective new client.

Fair enough, but of course I would tell the new client &quot;No, sorry, but I can&#039;t show you that material.  The contract with A----- precludes that&quot;.

&quot;No,&quot; said the lawyer, &quot;you can&#039;t say that.  The existence of a relationship between your company and A----- is confidential.&quot;

&quot;So what do I say when they ask why they can&#039;t see samples of my work for A-----?&quot;

&quot;You say nothing.&quot;

Needless to say, I asked for and received permission to strike the &quot;the existence of this contract is a secret&quot; clause.  And the Comedy of the Absurd was concluded, at least for that performance.

Tell me, do lawyers actually get &lt;strong&gt;paid&lt;/strong&gt; to write that stuff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was intrigued by your question:<br />
<blockquote cite="Has your software vendor put a gag order on your ability to seek help?">
<cite> </p>
<p>It begs the question of whether you are <strong>allowed</strong> to even reveal that fact &#8212; and it happened to me!</p>
<p>In a contract negotiation with a very large software firm (no tattle-tale-ing here, but they are based in Israel and the name starts with &#8220;A&#8221;), I noticed an interesting confidentiality clause.</p>
<p>Basically, it stated that I was not allowed to reveal the very <strong>existence</strong> of the entire contract!</p>
<p>Other provisions of the contract blocked me from &#8220;exhibiting&#8221; (in the legal sense) any of the work products &#8212; course exercises, slides etc. &#8212; which meant that I could not show examples of my good work to a prospective new client.</p>
<p>Fair enough, but of course I would tell the new client &#8220;No, sorry, but I can&#8217;t show you that material.  The contract with A&#8212;&#8211; precludes that&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;No,&#8221; said the lawyer, &#8220;you can&#8217;t say that.  The existence of a relationship between your company and A&#8212;&#8211; is confidential.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;So what do I say when they ask why they can&#8217;t see samples of my work for A&#8212;&#8211;?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;You say nothing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Needless to say, I asked for and received permission to strike the &#8220;the existence of this contract is a secret&#8221; clause.  And the Comedy of the Absurd was concluded, at least for that performance.</p>
<p>Tell me, do lawyers actually get <strong>paid</strong> to write that stuff?</cite></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinnie mirchandani</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>vinnie mirchandani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=1248#comment-437</guid>
		<description>Ray, thanks for highlighting the issue, my POV and that of an attorney below:

http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2009/02/the-gag-rule-in-tech-contracts.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray, thanks for highlighting the issue, my POV and that of an attorney below:</p>
<p><a href="http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2009/02/the-gag-rule-in-tech-contracts.html" rel="nofollow">http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2009/02/the-gag-rule-in-tech-contracts.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James MacLennan</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>vinnie mirchandani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=1248#comment-437</guid>
		<description>Ray, thanks for highlighting the issue, my POV and that of an attorney below:

http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2009/02/the-gag-rule-in-tech-contracts.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray, thanks for highlighting the issue, my POV and that of an attorney below:</p>
<p><a href="http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2009/02/the-gag-rule-in-tech-contracts.html" rel="nofollow">http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2009/02/the-gag-rule-in-tech-contracts.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Tuesday&#8217;s Tip: Software Licensing and Pricing &#8211; Now&#8217;s The Time To Remove &#8220;Gag Rule&#8221; Clauses In Your Software Contracts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/</link>
	<description>Your buy side advocate for enterprise apps strategies, vendor selection, &#38; contract negotiations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:41:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ITAM Review &#187; ITAM Industry News Round-Up</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-4818</link>
		<dc:creator>ITAM Review &#187; ITAM Industry News Round-Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=1248#comment-4818</guid>
		<description>[...] Software Insider &#8211; R &#8220;Ray&#8221; Wang&#8217;s Blog An article showing some of the gag clauses used by software vendors in their agreements.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Software Insider &#8211; R &#8220;Ray&#8221; Wang&#8217;s Blog An article showing some of the gag clauses used by software vendors in their agreements.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David A. Freedman, at Insource Training</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>David A. Freedman, at Insource Training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=1248#comment-484</guid>
		<description>I was intrigued by your question: &lt;blockquote cite=&quot;Has your software vendor put a gag order on your ability to seek help?&quot;&gt; 
&lt;cite&gt; 

It begs the question of whether you are &lt;strong&gt;allowed&lt;/strong&gt; to even reveal that fact -- and it happened to me!

In a contract negotiation with a very large software firm (no tattle-tale-ing here, but they are based in Israel and the name starts with &quot;A&quot;), I noticed an interesting confidentiality clause.

Basically, it stated that I was not allowed to reveal the very &lt;strong&gt;existence&lt;/strong&gt; of the entire contract!

Other provisions of the contract blocked me from &quot;exhibiting&quot; (in the legal sense) any of the work products -- course exercises, slides etc. -- which meant that I could not show examples of my good work to a prospective new client.

Fair enough, but of course I would tell the new client &quot;No, sorry, but I can&#039;t show you that material.  The contract with A----- precludes that&quot;.

&quot;No,&quot; said the lawyer, &quot;you can&#039;t say that.  The existence of a relationship between your company and A----- is confidential.&quot;

&quot;So what do I say when they ask why they can&#039;t see samples of my work for A-----?&quot;

&quot;You say nothing.&quot;

Needless to say, I asked for and received permission to strike the &quot;the existence of this contract is a secret&quot; clause.  And the Comedy of the Absurd was concluded, at least for that performance.

Tell me, do lawyers actually get &lt;strong&gt;paid&lt;/strong&gt; to write that stuff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was intrigued by your question:<br />
<blockquote cite="Has your software vendor put a gag order on your ability to seek help?">
<cite> </p>
<p>It begs the question of whether you are <strong>allowed</strong> to even reveal that fact &#8212; and it happened to me!</p>
<p>In a contract negotiation with a very large software firm (no tattle-tale-ing here, but they are based in Israel and the name starts with &#8220;A&#8221;), I noticed an interesting confidentiality clause.</p>
<p>Basically, it stated that I was not allowed to reveal the very <strong>existence</strong> of the entire contract!</p>
<p>Other provisions of the contract blocked me from &#8220;exhibiting&#8221; (in the legal sense) any of the work products &#8212; course exercises, slides etc. &#8212; which meant that I could not show examples of my good work to a prospective new client.</p>
<p>Fair enough, but of course I would tell the new client &#8220;No, sorry, but I can&#8217;t show you that material.  The contract with A&#8212;&#8211; precludes that&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;No,&#8221; said the lawyer, &#8220;you can&#8217;t say that.  The existence of a relationship between your company and A&#8212;&#8211; is confidential.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;So what do I say when they ask why they can&#8217;t see samples of my work for A&#8212;&#8211;?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;You say nothing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Needless to say, I asked for and received permission to strike the &#8220;the existence of this contract is a secret&#8221; clause.  And the Comedy of the Absurd was concluded, at least for that performance.</p>
<p>Tell me, do lawyers actually get <strong>paid</strong> to write that stuff?</cite></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinnie mirchandani</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>vinnie mirchandani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=1248#comment-437</guid>
		<description>Ray, thanks for highlighting the issue, my POV and that of an attorney below:

http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2009/02/the-gag-rule-in-tech-contracts.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray, thanks for highlighting the issue, my POV and that of an attorney below:</p>
<p><a href="http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2009/02/the-gag-rule-in-tech-contracts.html" rel="nofollow">http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2009/02/the-gag-rule-in-tech-contracts.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James MacLennan</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2009/01/27/tuesdays-tip-nows-the-time-to-remove-gag-rule-clauses-in-your-software-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>James MacLennan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=1248#comment-324</guid>
		<description>I recently partnered up with a third party contract specialist firm - got good results; would be a Bad Thing to lose such rights!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently partnered up with a third party contract specialist firm &#8211; got good results; would be a Bad Thing to lose such rights!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
