^[1]

More details have emerged on the actual 10 or 11 KPI’s that SUGEN and SAP have agreed to ^[2] as well as the SAP’s targets for showing value.  To start with, here are the main KPI’s for each category:

SUGEN KPI’S

Business Continuity

• Increased business solution availability
• Reduced amount of work related to all SAP incidents (including reduced mean time to resolve and reduced overall SAP incidents)

Business Process Performance

• Reduced number of emergency changes.
• Reduced amount of work for post-go-live stabilization and optimization.
• Reduced number of failed changes, which must be backed out of business solutions in productive use.

Protection of Investment

• Deployment of the latest innovation for application and technology stacks.
• Reduced maintenance costs by elimination of unnecessary modifications.

Total Cost of Operations:

• Decreased hardware costs (e.g. CPU).
• Decreased storage costs.
• Reduced total work of deploying support and enhancement packages.

Approach shows rigor in the cost justification and value process

According to user group members, measurements will be conducted quarterly with the first one occurring in every six months.  SAP must also show the following in order to prove value:

1. Demonstrate tangible cumulative cost savings for customers exceeding the increase in support fees
2. Prove KPI index decrease by 30 percent within the next four years, aggregated over the100 customers participating in the benchmark program
3. Use cumulative savings over the four years using a pre-define schedule of four percent in 2009, 12 percent in 2010, 22 percent in 2011, reaching the full 30 percent by 2012

The bottom line – user groups should now determine the minimum R&D percentage of investment from revenues

The SUGEN KPI’s provide a great framework for other user groups to begin a discussion on the value of the new SAP  Enterprise Support offering in comparison to today’s programs.  Keep in mind, these are only useful when vendors must justify a maintenance fee increase.  The bigger and more important issue – how are the maintenance revenues reinvested?  Consequently, users should begin to track the ratio ^[3]of R&D dollars that tie back to the amount of maintenance revenue.  This will be key issue for the next 5 to 10 years.

Your POV

Do you think SAP met its promise to SUGEN?  Will this help you with your commitment to SAP?  Do you feel SAP has now done the right thing?  Send me a private email to rwang0 at gmail dot com.  Posts are preferred!   Thanks and looking forward to your POV!

Copyright © 2009 R Wang. All rights reserved.