<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday&#8217;s Musings: Why Users Must Preserve Their Third Party Maintenance Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2010/02/22/mondays-musings-why-users-must-preserve-their-third-party-maintenance-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2010/02/22/mondays-musings-why-users-must-preserve-their-third-party-maintenance-rights/</link>
	<description>Your buy side advocate for enterprise apps strategies, vendor selection, &#38; contract negotiations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 23:40:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Event Report: Questions Every #SAPPHIRENOW Attendee Should Be Asking SAP : Enterprise Irregulars</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2010/02/22/mondays-musings-why-users-must-preserve-their-third-party-maintenance-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-20665</link>
		<dc:creator>Event Report: Questions Every #SAPPHIRENOW Attendee Should Be Asking SAP : Enterprise Irregulars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 01:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=4352#comment-20665</guid>
		<description>[...] CIO’s intend to drive cost out not invest more in.  Hence, many customers consider  a move to third party maintenance options and SAP optimization [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CIO’s intend to drive cost out not invest more in.  Hence, many customers consider  a move to third party maintenance options and SAP optimization [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monday’s Musings: Thoughts On How Indian Infotech Companies Can Lead Instead Of Follow &#124; Constellation Research</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2010/02/22/mondays-musings-why-users-must-preserve-their-third-party-maintenance-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-10326</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday’s Musings: Thoughts On How Indian Infotech Companies Can Lead Instead Of Follow &#124; Constellation Research</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 00:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=4352#comment-10326</guid>
		<description>[...] third party maintenance. Take part the existing vendor hegemony.  By delivering on third party maintenance, you’ll free up revenues that could be invested in your projects, not over-inflated profits.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] third party maintenance. Take part the existing vendor hegemony.  By delivering on third party maintenance, you’ll free up revenues that could be invested in your projects, not over-inflated profits.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuesday&#8217;s Tip: Dealing With Vendor Threats To Charge For Back Maintenance Fees</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2010/02/22/mondays-musings-why-users-must-preserve-their-third-party-maintenance-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-5457</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuesday&#8217;s Tip: Dealing With Vendor Threats To Charge For Back Maintenance Fees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=4352#comment-5457</guid>
		<description>[...] party maintenance (3PM) looking to future upgrade/replacement. Those customers (16.28% n=7/43) who move to a third party maintenance provider and give up future upgrade rights often face threats from sales people that they will have to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] party maintenance (3PM) looking to future upgrade/replacement. Those customers (16.28% n=7/43) who move to a third party maintenance provider and give up future upgrade rights often face threats from sales people that they will have to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuesday&#8217;s Tip: When To Go With A Two-Tier ERP Strategy</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2010/02/22/mondays-musings-why-users-must-preserve-their-third-party-maintenance-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-4797</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuesday&#8217;s Tip: When To Go With A Two-Tier ERP Strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=4352#comment-4797</guid>
		<description>[...] a move to adopt new disruptive technologies, slow pace of innovation from incumbent vendors, and high maintenance fees have changed many organization&#8217;s perspectives.  Add a slew of rapidly changing business [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a move to adopt new disruptive technologies, slow pace of innovation from incumbent vendors, and high maintenance fees have changed many organization&#8217;s perspectives.  Add a slew of rapidly changing business [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R "Ray" Wang</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2010/02/22/mondays-musings-why-users-must-preserve-their-third-party-maintenance-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-4706</link>
		<dc:creator>R "Ray" Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=4352#comment-4706</guid>
		<description>Great catch. making the fix right now. it should say....Oracle at 88.1% and SAP at 76.2%. !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great catch. making the fix right now. it should say&#8230;.Oracle at 88.1% and SAP at 76.2%. !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davin Wilfrid</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2010/02/22/mondays-musings-why-users-must-preserve-their-third-party-maintenance-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-4705</link>
		<dc:creator>Davin Wilfrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=4352#comment-4705</guid>
		<description>Hi Ray, 

Probably a small issue, but you appear to have some numbers flipped, either in Figure 3 or the paragraph that describes it:

&quot;Of the 101 respondents in Q1 2010 interested in 3PM, SAP (88.1%) and Oracle (76.2%) users expressed the greatest interest in seeking independent services (see Figure 3).&quot;

Fig 3 shows Oracle at 88.1% and SAP at 76.2%. 

Other than that, great insight and discussion.

- Davin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ray, </p>
<p>Probably a small issue, but you appear to have some numbers flipped, either in Figure 3 or the paragraph that describes it:</p>
<p>&#8220;Of the 101 respondents in Q1 2010 interested in 3PM, SAP (88.1%) and Oracle (76.2%) users expressed the greatest interest in seeking independent services (see Figure 3).&#8221;</p>
<p>Fig 3 shows Oracle at 88.1% and SAP at 76.2%. </p>
<p>Other than that, great insight and discussion.</p>
<p>- Davin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Software buyers must preserve 3PM rights &#124; Irregular Enterprise &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2010/02/22/mondays-musings-why-users-must-preserve-their-third-party-maintenance-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-4703</link>
		<dc:creator>Software buyers must preserve 3PM rights &#124; Irregular Enterprise &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=4352#comment-4703</guid>
		<description>[...] Ray Wang provided me with a sneak preview of survey results on factors driving the trend towards third party maintenance. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ray Wang provided me with a sneak preview of survey results on factors driving the trend towards third party maintenance. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

