Archive for July, 2010

Research Report: The Upcoming Battle For The Largest Share Of The Tech Budget (Part 1) – Overview

Welcome to a multi-part series on The Software Insider Tech Ecosystem Model.  Subsequent posts will apply the model to these leading vendors:

  • Cisco
  • Dell
  • HP
  • IBM
  • Microsoft
  • Oracle
  • Salesforce.com
  • SAP

The aggregation of these posts will result into a research report available for reprint rights.

Business Models Converge During Recessions

Is your technology provider a hardware vendor or a software vendor? Does your System Integrator now provide solutions in the cloud? These questions will continue as models converge.  Hardware, software, and system integration vendors must reinvent new models of revenue.  The economic recession has forced business model shifts at the major technology companies.  The goal – own the largest share of both the business and IT technology budget,  As these sellers attack new profit pools, buyers can expect continued convergence of business models because:

  • Hardware companies seek higher margins. Most hardware vendors face single digit margins in their core business.  To bolster margins, many vendors acquired system integration firms.  For example, HP purchased EDS and Dell acquired Perot Systems.  The next logical step requires the hardware vendors to get into software.  Software margins hover from 10% to 50% depending on the market.  Expect a hardware vendor such as Cisco, Dell, or HP to acquire a SaaS based company to move into the software business.
  • Service providers build differentiated intellectual property (IP) using the Cloud. Service providers should go on the SaaS/Cloud offensive if they want to deliver rapid innovation to customers and break the cycle of dependence on packaged apps vendors.  Service providers can take market share through SaaS by investing in white spaces in the solution road map with verticals and other pivot points that have not been well served.  In addition, expect forms of SaaS BPO to emerge as clients seek best of breed SaaS and hybrid deployments.
  • Software companies use Cloud to transform into information brokers. SaaS and Cloud deployments provide companies with hidden value and software companies with new revenues streams.  Data will become more valuable than the software in the Cloud.  Three areas of growth will include benchmarking, trending, and prediction.
  • Companies by-pass software vendors for competitive advantage. Roper Industries acquisition of iTrade Networks on July 26th, proves a key point.  Smart and innovative companies will put custom development in the cloud to meet last-mile solution needs that packaged apps vendors or system integrators fail to deliver.  Companies may also acquire software vendors if they can’t build the solution.

More…

Personal Log: The 7 Tenets Of Building A “Star Analyst” Firm

Inspired By The Lessons Learned From Others Before Me

One day on a family vacation in June 2009, my dad came up to me and said, “Son, why are you working so hard for someone else?”  Coming from my father, a “company man” who worked 30 years at the same company and rose from the ranks from staff engineer to General Manager for Technology, I was shocked.  He had always talked about the virtues of sticking it out with the same employer, why it was great to have a stable job, and why he sacrificed so much for the kids by sticking it out.  But he looked back at me and said it again, “Ray, what’s wrong with you, you need to start your own business.  You are working so hard for someone else.”  Still in shock, he said, “Tell me what you need and I’ll give you a loan if you need it.”  Well, this was enough for me to finalize the decision to leave.

So, I talked to over 40 successful independent analysts, star analysts, and industry analyst pioneers about what they liked and disliked about their jobs.  I wanted to know the rise and fall of Meta Group and Giga Group.  I talked to Barry Wilderman at Meta.  I reached out to Gideon Gartner’s original crew to see if he built out ExpertNet yet.  I chatted with some of the early Forresterites.  I found some old Yankee folks.  I spoke with AR professionals on their observations.  I talked to Fred Abbot and Linda Ziffrin at V3 about which analysts were successful and why.  For those who might not know, V3 is often described as the Jerry Maguire of the industry for helping to establish many independent analysts.  In fact, their advice was so good, I agreed to sign a contract with them.  Now, some of you even got calls from me about what made a star talented firms work.  And to this day, I am thankful for your great advice and support.  More importantly, the validation that the high quality firm I sought to build could be achieved.  Finding the right profiles for the first few employees would be hard, but if you did it, you had a shot to make a difference for your clients and the industry.

Star Analyst Firm Best Practices Shared By Over 40 Leading Industry Authorities

The best practices came from a context of how to build the next top analyst firm.  These conversations with 40 leading analysts provide insight into this craft industry.  However, these tenets apply not only to the industry analyst world, but also to high performing teams of top talented individuals.  Here are the seven tenets I captured in July of 2009:

1.  Star quality requirement.
Almost everyone I spoke with began by saying, “Start with star talent.  Don’t make compromises on B-players.”  Then they added, “Most will fail to keep this up over time because the firm gets greedy and focused on leverage instead of client quality.  Keep in mind, if you lack stars, you won’t attract stars.  Set high standards for recruitment.”  The experts are right.  Buyers, sellers, and the media have to recognize your team as market leaders.  The power of bringing together a collection of 2 or 3 stars can impact the market and rapidly carve a niche with the Big 3 (i.e. Gartner, Forrester, and IDC).  The flip side, if you hire non-stars, you will spend too much time trying to build up a brand, train people on deficiencies, and build too much infrastructure to grow.  Clients would take forever to sign up with you.  You will waste sales cycles.  Your sales people would spend too much time trying to explain who you were and what the analysts can accomplish.  You will waste a lot of time on managing each other instead of delivering client value.  Your clients who wanted you but got a junior person, would feel cheated.   The pyramid leveraged model is doomed to failure b/c today’s clients want the stars if you charge star rates.  Imagine if you wanted Tom Cruise but got Tom Koos who was studying to be a Chinese version of Tom Cruise.  Would you pay those rates? No.

You also want to hit hard with high quality and name recognition off the back.  You need to set the bar high for others.  You have to earn the right to be designated a star analyst firm.  The goal – bring in the top 10% of the analysts in the world together.  This is how you command the billing rates.  You’ll need to retain stars but that’s what items 2 to 7 talk about, so hang in there.

Now, not everyone’s going to survive the star model.  If people do not perform or make it, you help for a limited period of time (e.g. 3 to 6 months) and then cut the losses because they did not make the standards, the timing may be off, or the market will not support them.  If you fail to remove those individuals, you immediately lose trust, camaraderie, and respect from the other analysts in the firm.  Your firm will be paralyzed with indecision, poor leadership, and constant bickering.  The stars do not want to collaborate with the non-stars.  The non-stars end up serving as grunts and lackeys to the other analysts.  By playing a supporting role, they quickly lose respect.  Better cut the losses early and avoid the tension.

Another finding, expect analysts to come and go over time.  Build an alumni program because it’s good to have alumni advocates.  Make sure you recognize them and encourage them to be part of the constellation of stars in the universe for collaboration.  Invite them to your events.  Keep them engaged.

Lessons learned:  Hire and attract stars or risk spend your time spinning into a black hole.  Remove under-performers early or lose trust and collaboration.

More…

News Analysis: Jive Fills Warchest, Ready to Battle Enterprise Software Giants And IPO?


with Jeremiah Owyang – Customer Strategy (@jowyang)  and R “Ray” Wang – Enterprise Strategy (@rwang0),  both founding partners at Altimeter Group. Cross-posted link here.

Community Platforms Evolve Into Social Business Category
Having tracked the social business category for some years now, and having watched the category grow, many players have expanded into other niches.  At first, the community platform space (e.g. InGage, Jive, KickApps, Lithium, Mzinga, etc.) was insular, focused only on enterprise communities.  However, the space has evolved into Social CRM, Application Platforms, Social Media Management Systems, Brand Monitoring, corporate email systems and will eventually morph to focus on VRM and customer experience that’s native to the customer.   This evolution may manifest into social, it may play out into mobile, and it may take even radical forms including in store displays advertising.

The Situation – C Round Funding
Jive, who recently raised a $15mm in 2007 has capped off their war chest with a hefty $30mm ‘C round’ for a total of $57.5 million in total.  Why this large amount?  ‘D rounds’ are virtually non-existent out of Sand Hill road, and if they need investment they’ll have to get from a partner corporation.

SWOT Analysis

  • Strengths: Jive has been hailed as a leader in the social software category, (i.e. Forrester Wave and three Gartner Quadrants), and continues to show growth with large clients, claiming sales in the range of “$75,000-$150,000 per customer.  Some of those deals include ten – with average selling prices (ASP’s) of $1 million, four of which closed in the last two quarters. While Jive is not yet cash-flow positive, the company has 3,000 customers, 15 million users, and will end the year on a $100 million run-rate” (source).  Jive’s recent acquisition of brand monitoring company FiltrBox demonstrates the pre-cursor of SCRM systems.  In addition, Jive has formed a variety of strategic partnerships including social business consultants Dachis Group.  The team recently hired a new CEO, Tony Zingale, a seasoned leader of Mercury Interactive, where he clinched $1B revenues and led a $5B sale to HP.  Last but not least, the company shifted their headquarters from trendy Portland, Oregon to tech (and VC) centric Palo Alto, CA.
  • Weaknesses: They’re undergoing a cultural shift from a hip Portland startup, to becoming a tried and true enterprise player.  With a new CEO and with a new CMO (Kiker has moved on) to take the helm soon, Jive will have to undergo both an internal mindset change as they shift to battle enterprise players.   Also, as Jive takes on larger clients, they risk alienating their small and medium size clients who can’t afford, or can’t scale with Jive’s new value proposition.
  • Opportunities: Expect this war chest to be used to bolster the sales and marketing team.  C-rounds often focus on getting the company ready for a “material” event.  Jive will most likely use this time to build out significant partner channels and business development with enterprise clients.  Platform investments should support new partner models that support value added service growth.  Expect Jive to focus on bookings and immediate recurring revenue in order to maximize value for a ‘material’ event.  Significant acquisitions may come after a material event but not likely at this point in time.
  • Threats: Key threats come from larger vendors who may suddenly gain a “social” religion.   Jive must transform from dominating the small pond of community platforms to winning the large enterprise.  Corporate strategies must prepare the company for a new type of battle in the enterprise application market.  Should an Oracle or SAP decide to enter the market, it may make overtures for an acquisition.  Salesforce.com and RightNow are the biggest CRM threats as they have integrated with key social business constituents.  Chatter for Salesforce.com offers competitive features on an existing footprint of innovative customers.  Mainstay social business platform Microsoft Sharepoint can continue to win favor through having a large direct and channel sales force.  New threats may come from reemerging vendors such as Broadvision, who bring a pedigree of  traditional eBusiness. While Jive is often compared with Lithium, the likely outcome – continued verticalization and increased friction with the larger enterprise software players.  CEO Tony Zingale often publicly denounces incumbents for having Social media “bolt on” features and Jive bloggers often throw bombs at the CRM vendors.  Expect incumbents to use their existing enterprise footprints, CIO relationships, and direct and channel sales teams to their advantage.

More…

Event Report: Microsoft Worldwide Partner Conference 2010

Microsoft Continues To Embrace The Cloud And Hopes Its Partners Jump In

Microsoft kicked off arguably one of the best WPC’s in history at the Washington, DC, Convention Center.  From tremendous networking opportunities to keynotes from Bill Clinton, the time was well spent despite the scorching summer heat. As expected, the key theme was Cloud, Cloud, Cloud; and Azure, Azure, Azure.  In a quick and unscientific survey of 62 Microsoft Partners, only 11 truly understood how they would adopt Azure. More importantly, only 5 out of the 11 partners who understood Azure could figure out a viable revenue model.  The inability to come up with a viable business model on Azure could quickly become Microsoft’s Achilles heel in gaining market adoption.

A photo collage of the event can be seen below (see Figure 1):

Figure 1. Microsoft WPC 2010 Flickr Feed



Source:Copyright © 2010 R Wang and Insider Associates, LLC. All rights reserved.

The Bottom Line For Buyers (Clients) – Expect Azure Solutions To Take Some Time To Mature

Microsoft delivers its solutions via an indirect selling model – partner ecosystems.  Adoption of technologies by Microsoft’s partners will determine what key features will be delivered to customers.  Given that Microsoft just began marketing Azure and the Cloud to partners, and partners must determine an appropriate business model, customers can expect a trickle of solutions in the next 12 months.  The majority of partners must find the right business model and this could take the next 2 to 3 years to come to fruition.

Your POV

Microsoft customers, what’s your view on SaaS vs Cloud and Azure?  Ready to embrace Azure as a deployment option from your partners?  Are you looking at private, public, or hybrid cloud options?  Add your comments to the discussion or send on to rwang0 at gmail dot com or r at softwaresinsider dot org and we’ll keep your anonymity.

Please let us know if you need help you and your clients with SaaS/Cloud strategies.  Here’s how we can help:

  • Crafting a next gen apps strategy
  • Short listing and vendor selection
  • Contract negotiations support
  • Market evaluation
  • Implementation partner selection
  • Connecting with other partners
  • Sharing best practices
  • Designing a next gen apps strategy
  • Providing contract negotiations and software licensing support
  • Demystifying software licensing

Reprints

Reprints can be purchased through the Software Insider brand or Altimeter Group.  To request official reprints in PDF format, please contact r@softwareinsider.org.

Disclosure

Although we work closely with many mega software vendors, we want you to trust us.  Microsoft is currently a retainer client of Altimeter Group but not a client of Insider Associates, LLC.  For the full disclosure policy please refer here.

Copyright © 2010 R Wang and Insider Associates, LLC. All rights reserved.

News Analysis: Infor’s Cloud Strategy Goes Azure With Infor24

On July 12th, 2010, Infor announced its Infor24 initiative at the Microsoft Worldwide Partner Conference (WPC).  Infor24 represents the Alpharetta, GA software titan’s foray to deliver its solution offerings in the cloud and a continued bet on Microsoft for key technologies.  Here’s the first take on the news and from exclusive conversations with Soma Somasundaram, SVP of Development and James Willey, Senior Director of Solutions Management:

  • Three “on-demand” cloud solutions available today. Infor offers Expense Management, Asset Management, and ERP.  ERP SyteLine represents the first cloud based ERP offering from Infor.  These solutions will move to the cloud powered by Windows Azure, Infor ION, and a future portal product by 2011.  InforION provides key hybrid on-premises and cloud integration.

    Point of View (POV):
    Delivery of expense management (Infor XM) and asset management (Infor EAM) as a cloud solution allows Infor to expand out to non-Infor base.  Existing customers can take advantage of the solution and integrate back through InforION.  To become a true software-as-a-service (SaaS) solution, multi-tenancy will have to occur not only at the app server tier but also at the database level.  Infor will most likely make the move to SQL Azure to achieve this.  Customers should look forward to seeing how these solutions take advantage of the full Azure stack.
  • Next generation solutions in 2011 based on Microsoft Windows Azure. Infor’s future solutions will be powered by the Windows Azure development environment (see Figure 1).  Infor’s cloud strategy includes Microsoft Reporting via Infor Ion, Microsoft Analysis Services powering Infor Business Intelligence, and Microsoft Portal powering a future product.  Next generation solutions will run on Microsoft Azure data centers.

    POV:
    As Infor makes the shift to Azure, customers can expect other areas such as public sector solutions to be delivered by the second half of 2011.  Infor customers on IBM i-Series based products should seek a roadmap for their product lines onto Azure.

Figure 1. Infor 24 Bets On Microsoft Windows Azure For Current And Future Roadmap

Source: Infor

More…

Industry Event: 13th Annual HR Technology Conference & Exposition

General Session
The Great Technology Debate:
Naomi Lee Bloom and Jim Holincheck

Naomi Lee Bloom, Managing Partner, Bloom & Wallace
Jim Holincheck, Managing VP, Finance, HCM and Procurement, Gartner

N.  Bloom J. Holincheck
Thursday, September 30 • 8:45 – 10 a.m.
Yes, the world’s two leading experts on HR technology – and the longest veterans of our renowned former Analyst Panel – will face off on the hottest issues of the day. If held today, it might include such issues as how PeopleSoft Enterprise and Oracle EBS customers should think about their application strategy – especially after seeing Oracle’s demo of its next generation HCM the afternoon before. What is “true” SaaS and does it matter? Will it be the only form of service delivery in the future? Have organizations been implementing Talent Management the right or the wrong way? What is the real deal with Workforce Analytics and Planning? But who can really say what the questions will be in September? Come find out and even ask one yourself!

Come join this must attend industry event.  Take advantage of the SoftwareInsider discount code RWANG10 and receive $500 off when you register here

Disclosure

Although we work closely with many buy-side and sell-side clients, we want you to trust us.  HR Tech is not a retainer client of Altimeter Group nor that of Insider Associates, LLC.  For the full disclosure policy please refer here.

Copyright © 2010 R Wang and Insider Associates, LLC. All rights reserved.

Research Report: Microsoft Partners – Before Adopting Azure, Understand the 12 Benefits And Risks

It’s All About The Cloud At WPC10

Attendees at this year’s Microsoft Worldwide Partner Conference 2010 in Washington, D.C. already expect Windows Azure development to be a key theme throughout this annual pilgrimage.  Microsoft has made significant investments into the cloud.   Many executives from the Redmond, WA, software giant have publicly stated that 90% of its development will be focused on the Cloud by 2012.  Delivery of the Cloud begins with the Azure platform which includes three main offerings:

  1. Microsoft Windows Azure
  2. Microsoft SQL Azure (formerly SQL Services)
  3. Microsoft Windows Azure Platform: AppFabric (formerly .NET Services).

Therefore, Microsoft partners must determine their strategy based on what part of the cloud they plan to compete in and which Azure services to leverage.  As with any cloud platform, the four layers include infrastructure, orchestration, creation, and consumption (see Figure 1):

  • Infrastructure. At a minimum, Windows Azure provides the infrastructure as a service.  Data center investments and the related capital expense (capex) is replace with oeprational expenses (opex).  Most partners will take advantage of Azure at the infrastructure level or consider alternatives such as Amazon EC2 or even self provision hosting on partner servers and hardware.
  • Orchestration. Microsoft Windows Azure Platform: AppFabric delivers the key “middleware” layers.  AppFabric includes an enterprise service bus to connect across network and organizational boundaries.  AppFabric also delivers access control security for federated authorization.  Most partners will leverage these PaaS tools.  However, non-Microsoft tools could include advanced SaaS integration, complex event processing, business process management, and richer BI tools.  The Windows AppFabric July release now supports Adobe Flash and Microsoft SilverLight.
  • Creation. Most partners will build solutions via VisualStudio and Microsoft SQL Azure (formerly SQL Services).  Other creation tools could include Windows Phone7 and even Java.  Most partners expect to use the majority of tools from Microsoft and augment with third party solutions as needed.
  • Consumption. Here’s where partners will create value added solutions for sale to customers.  Partners must build applications that create market driven differentiators.  For most partners, the value added solutions in the consumption layer will provide the highest margin and return on investment (ROI).

.NET:.NET (tongue and cheek here) – Microsoft partners and developers can transfer existing skill sets and move to the cloud with ease, once Microsoft irons out the business model for partners on Azure.

Figure 1. Partners Must Determine Which Layer To Place Strategic Bets

screen-shot-2010-03-22-at-105927-pm

More…

Tuesday’s Tip: Applying The Five Stages Of Adoption Towards SCRM Projects

Social CRM Faces Initial Adoption Hurdles From Management

In 1969, Elisabeth Kübler-Ross introduced the “Five Stages of Grief” in her book, On Death and Dying. These five stages can be summed up as denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance.  When applied to disruptive technology adoption by organizations, the “Five Stages” framework provides clear insight in anticipating how likely an organization is ready to embrace change.  Recent conversations with line of business operations managers about Social CRM identify both lack of awareness and high levels of internal resistance towards adoption.  In a recent phone and in-person survey of 31 front office operations owners (i.e. sales executives, support executives, and COO’s) about their attitudes on Social CRM, 67.7% (i.e. 21/31) expressed denial, 16.1% (i.e. 5/31) felt anger, and 9.6% (i.e. 3/31) experienced bargaining, 3.2% (i.e. 1/31)  encountered depression, and 3.2% (i.e. 1/31) achieved acceptance (see Figure 1).

Figure 1. Most Front Office Executives Live In Denial About SCRM


More…

Thursday’s Disruptive Tech Showcase: RainStor Tackles The Tough Challenges Of Information Preservation

Organizations Facing The Big Data Problem Must Solve The TCO Of Data Retention

The explosion in data volumes from terabytes to petabytes (i.e. 1 quadrillion bytes) drives many organizations to identify cost effective solutions for the retention and on demand retrieval of historical data.  More importantly, organizations must meet a plethora of changing business and compliance requirements.  RainStor’s solution focuses in on the retention of read-only or inactive structured data.  The solution delivers the “Three R’s” of fundamental data management capabilities for its customers by:

  • Reduction. Effective storage requires secure but accessible data reduction that can encapsulate data without loss in content or structure.  RainStor can take structured data sources such as log files, database, and event data and compress to a 40:1 ratio into containers of discrete files.  This means up to a 97% savings in storage costs.  On top of the compression, RainStor de-duplicates data values and detects patterns so values only need to be stored once.  This means information is stored in a tree structure while still maintaining a full representation of the original records.  The result – in repetitive transactions such as call data logs and stock transactions, storage costs drop by geometric proportions (see Figure 1).
  • Retention. Compliance rules create unnecessary complexity in managing retention and purge parameters.  Data in the RainStor solution follows existing policies and remains “as-is” or immutable.  The system preserves the original structure of the stored records.  Users gain control in managing compliance rules and can even store the data in an unstructured data solution such as EMC Centera.  The solution utilizes commodity storage systems and doesn’t require specialized DBA skills.  Organizations can keep their SAN, NAS, DAS, CAS, or even go with cloud storage options.
  • Retrieval. Existing systems remain challenged in preserving schema evolution and often lose context after upgrades from release to release.  In RainStor, the system stores schema and tables to be able to search back in a point in time.  By addressing schema evolution, any changes to new fields, tables, and columns are preserved and present the exact representation of the data regardless of query style.  As an extension repository, RainStor does not store in relational format and can instead point to a SQL statement.  Furthermore, organizations can retrieve data through SQL and BI tools such as ODBC/JDBC at RDBMS performance levels or better

Figure 1.  RainStor Applies Data De-duplication To Reduce Storage Costs

Source: RainStor

More…