<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Research Summary: Best Practices &#8211; The Case For Two-Tier ERP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/</link>
	<description>Your buy side advocate for enterprise apps strategies, vendor selection, &#38; contract negotiations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 23:40:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft to become ERP arms dealer? &#124; ZDNet</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/comment-page-1/#comment-11815</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft to become ERP arms dealer? &#124; ZDNet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7219#comment-11815</guid>
		<description>[...] it wants to be the go-to Tier 2 vendor in SAP/Oracle deployments, principally in manufacturing but also in four other verticals: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it wants to be the go-to Tier 2 vendor in SAP/Oracle deployments, principally in manufacturing but also in four other verticals: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Event Report: The Sentiment At Microsoft Convergence 2011</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/comment-page-1/#comment-11804</link>
		<dc:creator>Event Report: The Sentiment At Microsoft Convergence 2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 05:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7219#comment-11804</guid>
		<description>[...] while three ran Oracle, and another two ran custom legacy systems. Surveyed prospects believe that Two-tier ERP strategies will dominate future apps [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] while three ran Oracle, and another two ran custom legacy systems. Surveyed prospects believe that Two-tier ERP strategies will dominate future apps [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Event Report: The Sentiment At Microsoft Convergence 2011</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/comment-page-1/#comment-11801</link>
		<dc:creator>Event Report: The Sentiment At Microsoft Convergence 2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 02:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7219#comment-11801</guid>
		<description>[...] while 3 ran Oracle, and another dual ran tradition bequest systems. Surveyed prospects trust that Two-tier ERP strategies will browbeat destiny apps [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] while 3 ran Oracle, and another dual ran tradition bequest systems. Surveyed prospects trust that Two-tier ERP strategies will browbeat destiny apps [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Event Report: The Sentiment At Microsoft Convergence 2011</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/comment-page-1/#comment-11789</link>
		<dc:creator>Event Report: The Sentiment At Microsoft Convergence 2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 18:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7219#comment-11789</guid>
		<description>[...] three ran Oracle, and another two ran custom legacy systems.  Surveyed prospects believe that Two-tier ERP strategies will dominate future apps [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] three ran Oracle, and another two ran custom legacy systems.  Surveyed prospects believe that Two-tier ERP strategies will dominate future apps [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Event Report: The Sentiment At Microsoft Convergence 2011 &#8211; JailBake</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/comment-page-1/#comment-11788</link>
		<dc:creator>Event Report: The Sentiment At Microsoft Convergence 2011 &#8211; JailBake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 17:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7219#comment-11788</guid>
		<description>[...] while three ran Oracle, and another two ran custom legacy systems. Surveyed prospects believe that Two-tier ERP strategies will dominate future apps strategy. Figure 1. Flickr Feeds From Microsoft Dynamics [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] while three ran Oracle, and another two ran custom legacy systems. Surveyed prospects believe that Two-tier ERP strategies will dominate future apps strategy. Figure 1. Flickr Feeds From Microsoft Dynamics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Die Sonntagslinks &#8211; KW10 &#124; Geschäftsprozessmanagement in der Wolke</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/comment-page-1/#comment-11312</link>
		<dc:creator>Die Sonntagslinks &#8211; KW10 &#124; Geschäftsprozessmanagement in der Wolke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7219#comment-11312</guid>
		<description>[...] Ermöglicht eine 2-Schicht IT-Infrastruktur Kosteneinsparungen?  Nochmal &#8220;R &#8220;Ray&#8221; Wang&#8221; über den Trend weg von klassischen 3-Schichten [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ermöglicht eine 2-Schicht IT-Infrastruktur Kosteneinsparungen?  Nochmal &#8220;R &#8220;Ray&#8221; Wang&#8221; über den Trend weg von klassischen 3-Schichten [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Product Review: Inside SAP&#8217;s Line-of-Business OnDemand Strategy &#124; Online Buy Review</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/comment-page-1/#comment-11064</link>
		<dc:creator>Product Review: Inside SAP&#8217;s Line-of-Business OnDemand Strategy &#124; Online Buy Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7219#comment-11064</guid>
		<description>[...] you make the move to SAP’s OnDemand applications?  Are you an existing SAP customer looking at two-tier ERP? Will this keep you from looking at best of breed SaaS apps?  Add your comments to the blog or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you make the move to SAP’s OnDemand applications?  Are you an existing SAP customer looking at two-tier ERP? Will this keep you from looking at best of breed SaaS apps?  Add your comments to the blog or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Product Review: Inside SAP’s Line-of-Business OnDemand Strategy</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/comment-page-1/#comment-11055</link>
		<dc:creator>Product Review: Inside SAP’s Line-of-Business OnDemand Strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7219#comment-11055</guid>
		<description>[...] you make the move to SAP’s OnDemand applications?  Are you an existing SAP customer looking at two-tier ERP? Will this keep you from looking at best of breed SaaS apps?  Add your comments to the blog or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you make the move to SAP’s OnDemand applications?  Are you an existing SAP customer looking at two-tier ERP? Will this keep you from looking at best of breed SaaS apps?  Add your comments to the blog or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R "Ray" Wang</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/comment-page-1/#comment-11034</link>
		<dc:creator>R "Ray" Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 21:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7219#comment-11034</guid>
		<description>Lise - MDM plays a major role in these deployments.  A federated approach is the most popular from what we&#039;ve seen to date.  What are others seeing? - Ray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lise &#8211; MDM plays a major role in these deployments.  A federated approach is the most popular from what we&#8217;ve seen to date.  What are others seeing? &#8211; Ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lise Neely</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/comment-page-1/#comment-11027</link>
		<dc:creator>Lise Neely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7219#comment-11027</guid>
		<description>Hi Ray; always interesting to read your insights on ERP.  Surprisingly, you did not mention the role of Master Data Management in two-tier ERP deployments.  Since the two ERP tiers are interconnected, they&#039;d need some level of MDM to communicate consistently around key elements like customer, account, and so forth.  Among the surveyed companies, how many have incorporated MDM into the two-tier deployment?   In your experience, what style of MDM implementation best serves a two-tier ERP approach? 

With best regards from Lise Neely</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ray; always interesting to read your insights on ERP.  Surprisingly, you did not mention the role of Master Data Management in two-tier ERP deployments.  Since the two ERP tiers are interconnected, they&#8217;d need some level of MDM to communicate consistently around key elements like customer, account, and so forth.  Among the surveyed companies, how many have incorporated MDM into the two-tier deployment?   In your experience, what style of MDM implementation best serves a two-tier ERP approach? </p>
<p>With best regards from Lise Neely</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R "Ray" Wang</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/comment-page-1/#comment-10995</link>
		<dc:creator>R "Ray" Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 18:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7219#comment-10995</guid>
		<description>Steve - yes. ERP can&#039;t keep up today. Hence SaaS, Two-Tier, etc.  You make a good point on should we add to another ERP.  I would only add a new ERP that&#039;s innovative and flexible enough. That means modern architecture and new focus on user experience and service design thinking.  Solutions like BabbleApps also provide another approach.  Look forward to more discussions. Has anyone used Babble Apps? - Ray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve &#8211; yes. ERP can&#8217;t keep up today. Hence SaaS, Two-Tier, etc.  You make a good point on should we add to another ERP.  I would only add a new ERP that&#8217;s innovative and flexible enough. That means modern architecture and new focus on user experience and service design thinking.  Solutions like BabbleApps also provide another approach.  Look forward to more discussions. Has anyone used Babble Apps? &#8211; Ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R "Ray" Wang</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/comment-page-1/#comment-10994</link>
		<dc:creator>R "Ray" Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 18:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7219#comment-10994</guid>
		<description>Doug - love it. the painful descent to oblivion!!!  We are entering a phase of commoditization. Vendors who dont&#039; get this will become extinct.  Many were slow to the game but the high profits in maintenance revenue have given them room to reinvest and innovate. Let&#039;s see who makes it in the next decade.  What do you think?  - Ray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug &#8211; love it. the painful descent to oblivion!!!  We are entering a phase of commoditization. Vendors who dont&#8217; get this will become extinct.  Many were slow to the game but the high profits in maintenance revenue have given them room to reinvest and innovate. Let&#8217;s see who makes it in the next decade.  What do you think?  &#8211; Ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Hadden</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/comment-page-1/#comment-10993</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hadden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 18:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7219#comment-10993</guid>
		<description>Ray,

Have you ever thought that the famous Gartner hype cycle was missing the last stage of &quot;slow painful descent to oblivion?&quot; This study may be another milestone in the obsolescence of the ERP model. 

ERP is predicated on the notion of one solution to do all things regards of industry, business domain, geography, company size etc. Your report points out many of the signs that the ERP value proposition is waning:

- Rapid adoption of the cloud because of cost and agility reasons. It should be noted that most first and second tier ERP are built on legacy code. It is very difficult for ERP to migrate to SaaS without rewriting.

- Industry-specific and last mile concerns have become increasingly important. Many industries can become less efficient through homogenized ERP. Despite the &quot;portfolio management&quot; argument, it turns out that less expensive industry-friendly solutions are more effective and cost less even when integrated with different systems.

- Acceptance of so many companies of using Tier 2 solutions shows that the once-dominant notion that biggest is best is on the descent. Organizations realize that big ERP is not materially less risky than other solutions.

- Upgrade costs including the maintenance of customized code has become more visible to CIOs. The ERP market seems to be a diminishing returns for upgrades era. Each new version adds risk to what is actually working.

There are some other signs of the descent:

- Recognition that the entire software stack has commoditized. Proprietary stacks are holding customers hostage.

- The end of technology proprietary &quot;economies of scale.&quot; Many in the ERP business suggest that smaller firms can no longer compete with the top tier. Not enough people, not enough customers. Nothing is further from the truth. While the top tier is struggling to maintain legacy code and integrate among consolidated company products, more agile vendors are building extensible net-native applications on the open source or Microsoft stacks.

- General resistance to high-cost maintenance with little value. This recently created some backlash. And, the emergence of 3rd party service providers are digging into ERP company maintenance revenue. That&#039;s with maintenance representing the majority of ERP vendor revenue. 

Where are we on the descent? Tier 1 ERP companies might be in the same position Tier 1 networking companies (Novell, Banyan) were in 1994.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray,</p>
<p>Have you ever thought that the famous Gartner hype cycle was missing the last stage of &#8220;slow painful descent to oblivion?&#8221; This study may be another milestone in the obsolescence of the ERP model. </p>
<p>ERP is predicated on the notion of one solution to do all things regards of industry, business domain, geography, company size etc. Your report points out many of the signs that the ERP value proposition is waning:</p>
<p>- Rapid adoption of the cloud because of cost and agility reasons. It should be noted that most first and second tier ERP are built on legacy code. It is very difficult for ERP to migrate to SaaS without rewriting.</p>
<p>- Industry-specific and last mile concerns have become increasingly important. Many industries can become less efficient through homogenized ERP. Despite the &#8220;portfolio management&#8221; argument, it turns out that less expensive industry-friendly solutions are more effective and cost less even when integrated with different systems.</p>
<p>- Acceptance of so many companies of using Tier 2 solutions shows that the once-dominant notion that biggest is best is on the descent. Organizations realize that big ERP is not materially less risky than other solutions.</p>
<p>- Upgrade costs including the maintenance of customized code has become more visible to CIOs. The ERP market seems to be a diminishing returns for upgrades era. Each new version adds risk to what is actually working.</p>
<p>There are some other signs of the descent:</p>
<p>- Recognition that the entire software stack has commoditized. Proprietary stacks are holding customers hostage.</p>
<p>- The end of technology proprietary &#8220;economies of scale.&#8221; Many in the ERP business suggest that smaller firms can no longer compete with the top tier. Not enough people, not enough customers. Nothing is further from the truth. While the top tier is struggling to maintain legacy code and integrate among consolidated company products, more agile vendors are building extensible net-native applications on the open source or Microsoft stacks.</p>
<p>- General resistance to high-cost maintenance with little value. This recently created some backlash. And, the emergence of 3rd party service providers are digging into ERP company maintenance revenue. That&#8217;s with maintenance representing the majority of ERP vendor revenue. </p>
<p>Where are we on the descent? Tier 1 ERP companies might be in the same position Tier 1 networking companies (Novell, Banyan) were in 1994.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Christensen</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/comment-page-1/#comment-10992</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Christensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 18:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7219#comment-10992</guid>
		<description>Ray,

Business has always moved faster than ERP&#039;s could keep pace.  They just weren&#039;t made to keep up...they were made to consolidate and control vast empires of process, data and technology.

The Two-Tier strategy, while actively being considered, seems to have ginormous draw back: it uses another ERP to innovate changes in process, data and technology.  

Doesn&#039;t this seem like doubling down on the initial problem?  It didn&#039;t work the first time so lets try it again.  Except this time, let&#039;s integrate two disparate systems and create more support, upgrade, compatibility and change management issues.  Pushing two of these complex, rigid systems together seems short sighted.

A new category of enterprise software exists that offers a different strategy: one that achieves the agility and constant innovation required without any of the &quot;risks&quot; associated with the two-tier strategy.  We call our version of this new category BabbleApps. 

BabbleApps de-couple the needs of business for employees, vendors and customers from the existing ERP. Companies are able to rapidly deploy on-going, simple, powerful, grass-roots innovation.  

BabbleApps are designed, executed and measured for results BEFORE investment is required in as little as one week. Those resources that know your business and opportunity the best define exactly how the BabbleApp needs to work. Every company is unique and BabbleApps fit your Great Idea like a glove.

BabbleApps live on any network, are accessible via any browser capable device, are purchased on a subscription basis (even for &quot;on-premise&quot; deployment) and they consume and generate corporate and desktop level data without any hesitation.  

BabbleApps are scalable down to a single user in a single function.  Only those employees who need to be impacted are impacted; reducing change management.  You can start with just one employee with the new BabbleApp before interrupting any others.

Full Disclosure: BabbleWare created this next generation of software and has delivered dozens of BabbleApps to its customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray,</p>
<p>Business has always moved faster than ERP&#8217;s could keep pace.  They just weren&#8217;t made to keep up&#8230;they were made to consolidate and control vast empires of process, data and technology.</p>
<p>The Two-Tier strategy, while actively being considered, seems to have ginormous draw back: it uses another ERP to innovate changes in process, data and technology.  </p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t this seem like doubling down on the initial problem?  It didn&#8217;t work the first time so lets try it again.  Except this time, let&#8217;s integrate two disparate systems and create more support, upgrade, compatibility and change management issues.  Pushing two of these complex, rigid systems together seems short sighted.</p>
<p>A new category of enterprise software exists that offers a different strategy: one that achieves the agility and constant innovation required without any of the &#8220;risks&#8221; associated with the two-tier strategy.  We call our version of this new category BabbleApps. </p>
<p>BabbleApps de-couple the needs of business for employees, vendors and customers from the existing ERP. Companies are able to rapidly deploy on-going, simple, powerful, grass-roots innovation.  </p>
<p>BabbleApps are designed, executed and measured for results BEFORE investment is required in as little as one week. Those resources that know your business and opportunity the best define exactly how the BabbleApp needs to work. Every company is unique and BabbleApps fit your Great Idea like a glove.</p>
<p>BabbleApps live on any network, are accessible via any browser capable device, are purchased on a subscription basis (even for &#8220;on-premise&#8221; deployment) and they consume and generate corporate and desktop level data without any hesitation.  </p>
<p>BabbleApps are scalable down to a single user in a single function.  Only those employees who need to be impacted are impacted; reducing change management.  You can start with just one employee with the new BabbleApp before interrupting any others.</p>
<p>Full Disclosure: BabbleWare created this next generation of software and has delivered dozens of BabbleApps to its customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Research Summary: Best Practices – The Case For Two-Tier ERP &#124; Constellation Research</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/comment-page-1/#comment-10988</link>
		<dc:creator>Research Summary: Best Practices – The Case For Two-Tier ERP &#124; Constellation Research</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7219#comment-10988</guid>
		<description>[...] (Read the full article @ A Software Insider&#8217;s Point of View) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Read the full article @ A Software Insider&#8217;s Point of View) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R "Ray" Wang</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/comment-page-1/#comment-10982</link>
		<dc:creator>R "Ray" Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 16:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7219#comment-10982</guid>
		<description>John - appreciate it. keep up the fight on open source ERP!  Open source plays a key role in more and more as the primary tier, especially in academics and emea companies. Are others using Open Source ERP?  Please share your experiences! - Ray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8211; appreciate it. keep up the fight on open source ERP!  Open source plays a key role in more and more as the primary tier, especially in academics and emea companies. Are others using Open Source ERP?  Please share your experiences! &#8211; Ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Fandl</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/comment-page-1/#comment-10975</link>
		<dc:creator>John Fandl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 12:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7219#comment-10975</guid>
		<description>Ray, 

Re:

&quot;Organizations continue to face an onslaught of business requirements that their existing ERP systems can no longer address.  Stuck in the past century, these ERP systems are expensive to run, difficult to upgrade, and impossible to modify for today’s fast changing requirements.&quot;

This is spot on--and a new breed of &quot;Agile ERP&quot; can supplement the existing corporate standard legacy ERP, to deliver the business agility required to capture opportunities and respond to change.  At Openbravo, the main thrust of our new Openbravo 3release is toward SMBs, but we think it could make a lot of sense for the larger enterprise as well. What is your take on web-based open source ERP in the two-tier context?  I notice you mention cloud, but not open source, which is why I ask. 

Thanks for your consistent insights and solid writing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray, </p>
<p>Re:</p>
<p>&#8220;Organizations continue to face an onslaught of business requirements that their existing ERP systems can no longer address.  Stuck in the past century, these ERP systems are expensive to run, difficult to upgrade, and impossible to modify for today’s fast changing requirements.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is spot on&#8211;and a new breed of &#8220;Agile ERP&#8221; can supplement the existing corporate standard legacy ERP, to deliver the business agility required to capture opportunities and respond to change.  At Openbravo, the main thrust of our new Openbravo 3release is toward SMBs, but we think it could make a lot of sense for the larger enterprise as well. What is your take on web-based open source ERP in the two-tier context?  I notice you mention cloud, but not open source, which is why I ask. </p>
<p>Thanks for your consistent insights and solid writing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R "Ray" Wang</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/comment-page-1/#comment-10968</link>
		<dc:creator>R "Ray" Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 10:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7219#comment-10968</guid>
		<description>Clive - it&#039;s a good point. the fortune 500 and the global 2000 are more likely to go with Two-Tier ERP. Mid-sized and Small businesses are focused on on one-size fits all.   The issue is more than just cloud based ETL, it&#039;s about information governance and managing the integration.  What do others think?  - Ray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clive &#8211; it&#8217;s a good point. the fortune 500 and the global 2000 are more likely to go with Two-Tier ERP. Mid-sized and Small businesses are focused on on one-size fits all.   The issue is more than just cloud based ETL, it&#8217;s about information governance and managing the integration.  What do others think?  &#8211; Ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clive boulton</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/03/01/research-summary-best-practices-the-case-for-two-tier-erp/comment-page-1/#comment-10966</link>
		<dc:creator>clive boulton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 09:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7219#comment-10966</guid>
		<description>Hi Ray, 

Two-tier ERP, to optimize while gaining innovation, seems to be a hallmark of large cap companies. Examples I&#039;ve experienced

Berkshire Hathaway, doesn&#039;t toss out existing systems, for the corporate boiler plate  system. 

Another case is the largest Nasdaq high tech companies (under NDA here), who rapidly ramp up new product lines, especially in green field locations (can be overseas without Cloud broadband infrastructure).

It seems the CIO&#039;s at mid-size companies get drawn into one-size fits all ERP...

And what seems to tip mid-sized CIO&#039;s hands is the absence of proper Cloud based ETL services to roll up Two-Tier figures for reporting figures to HQ. Consolidating MRP for central purchasing, being another missing service...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ray, </p>
<p>Two-tier ERP, to optimize while gaining innovation, seems to be a hallmark of large cap companies. Examples I&#8217;ve experienced</p>
<p>Berkshire Hathaway, doesn&#8217;t toss out existing systems, for the corporate boiler plate  system. </p>
<p>Another case is the largest Nasdaq high tech companies (under NDA here), who rapidly ramp up new product lines, especially in green field locations (can be overseas without Cloud broadband infrastructure).</p>
<p>It seems the CIO&#8217;s at mid-size companies get drawn into one-size fits all ERP&#8230;</p>
<p>And what seems to tip mid-sized CIO&#8217;s hands is the absence of proper Cloud based ETL services to roll up Two-Tier figures for reporting figures to HQ. Consolidating MRP for central purchasing, being another missing service&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

