<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Take: Infor and Golden Gate Gain Definitive Agreement To Acquire Lawson For $2B</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/04/26/quick-take-infor-and-golden-gate-gain-definitive-agreement-to-acquire-lawson-for-2b/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/04/26/quick-take-infor-and-golden-gate-gain-definitive-agreement-to-acquire-lawson-for-2b/</link>
	<description>Your buy side advocate for enterprise apps strategies, vendor selection, &#38; contract negotiations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:35:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: R "Ray" Wang</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/04/26/quick-take-infor-and-golden-gate-gain-definitive-agreement-to-acquire-lawson-for-2b/comment-page-1/#comment-12145</link>
		<dc:creator>R "Ray" Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 16:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7590#comment-12145</guid>
		<description>Daniel - the new layer will probably be on Microsoft for now.  However, Infor is better in a position to back IBM technology as backing MSFT is backing a competitor.  - Ray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel &#8211; the new layer will probably be on Microsoft for now.  However, Infor is better in a position to back IBM technology as backing MSFT is backing a competitor.  &#8211; Ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R "Ray" Wang</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/04/26/quick-take-infor-and-golden-gate-gain-definitive-agreement-to-acquire-lawson-for-2b/comment-page-1/#comment-12144</link>
		<dc:creator>R "Ray" Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 16:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7590#comment-12144</guid>
		<description>Clive - not much innovation in the market place among the large vendors.  Their biz models have them going for fast follower status.  Some are just slow joggers =)  What do other folks think?  - Ray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clive &#8211; not much innovation in the market place among the large vendors.  Their biz models have them going for fast follower status.  Some are just slow joggers =)  What do other folks think?  &#8211; Ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clive boulton</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/04/26/quick-take-infor-and-golden-gate-gain-definitive-agreement-to-acquire-lawson-for-2b/comment-page-1/#comment-12143</link>
		<dc:creator>clive boulton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 16:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7590#comment-12143</guid>
		<description>Ray @ Dynamics CRM 2011, Vancouver, I almost melted. Project Green is now Managed Solutions. Last May , Redmond moved to block SFDCs ingenuity. Definitely, LJE is repurposing Sun assets, maybe not to be left behind. I asked Larry @ EdZ ChC event (he ducked). Marc and Hasso debated same puck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray @ Dynamics CRM 2011, Vancouver, I almost melted. Project Green is now Managed Solutions. Last May , Redmond moved to block SFDCs ingenuity. Definitely, LJE is repurposing Sun assets, maybe not to be left behind. I asked Larry @ EdZ ChC event (he ducked). Marc and Hasso debated same puck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/04/26/quick-take-infor-and-golden-gate-gain-definitive-agreement-to-acquire-lawson-for-2b/comment-page-1/#comment-12134</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7590#comment-12134</guid>
		<description>And the new experience layer is Infor Workspace or Lawson Smart office? 

What strategy would you expect there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the new experience layer is Infor Workspace or Lawson Smart office? </p>
<p>What strategy would you expect there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R "Ray" Wang</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/04/26/quick-take-infor-and-golden-gate-gain-definitive-agreement-to-acquire-lawson-for-2b/comment-page-1/#comment-12086</link>
		<dc:creator>R "Ray" Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7590#comment-12086</guid>
		<description>Daniel - Baan (LN) tends to be in larger shops.  M3 targets smaller shops and departments.  Both are older products.  The long term goal is to keep those platforms alive with cross sold products that abstract the data and transactions into a new user experience layer.  We&#039;ll see if this strategy succeeds.  - Ray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel &#8211; Baan (LN) tends to be in larger shops.  M3 targets smaller shops and departments.  Both are older products.  The long term goal is to keep those platforms alive with cross sold products that abstract the data and transactions into a new user experience layer.  We&#8217;ll see if this strategy succeeds.  &#8211; Ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/04/26/quick-take-infor-and-golden-gate-gain-definitive-agreement-to-acquire-lawson-for-2b/comment-page-1/#comment-12085</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7590#comment-12085</guid>
		<description>Product-wise, the real question is what will happen with M3 and LN (Baan). I do not see how these products complement each other. Both are manufacturing ERP products targeting almost the same markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Product-wise, the real question is what will happen with M3 and LN (Baan). I do not see how these products complement each other. Both are manufacturing ERP products targeting almost the same markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R "Ray" Wang</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/04/26/quick-take-infor-and-golden-gate-gain-definitive-agreement-to-acquire-lawson-for-2b/comment-page-1/#comment-12080</link>
		<dc:creator>R "Ray" Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7590#comment-12080</guid>
		<description>Phil - the cloud computing boat was hard to move lawson customers to b/c they weren&#039;t ready.  Lawson customers tend to be more conservative.  That being said, will Infor and Lawson customers be ready to embrace the cloud? What do you think? - Ray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil &#8211; the cloud computing boat was hard to move lawson customers to b/c they weren&#8217;t ready.  Lawson customers tend to be more conservative.  That being said, will Infor and Lawson customers be ready to embrace the cloud? What do you think? &#8211; Ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R "Ray" Wang</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/04/26/quick-take-infor-and-golden-gate-gain-definitive-agreement-to-acquire-lawson-for-2b/comment-page-1/#comment-12079</link>
		<dc:creator>R "Ray" Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7590#comment-12079</guid>
		<description>Clive - The puck&#039;s moving to scale.  Will that leave ingenuity behind? - Ray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clive &#8211; The puck&#8217;s moving to scale.  Will that leave ingenuity behind? &#8211; Ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clive boulton</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/04/26/quick-take-infor-and-golden-gate-gain-definitive-agreement-to-acquire-lawson-for-2b/comment-page-1/#comment-12036</link>
		<dc:creator>clive boulton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7590#comment-12036</guid>
		<description>Good customer road-map. 

&quot;skate to where the puck&#039;s going, not where it&#039;s been&quot;

Industry acquisitions boil down to who can build revenue scale to innovate and provision customizations in a SaaS architecture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good customer road-map. </p>
<p>&#8220;skate to where the puck&#8217;s going, not where it&#8217;s been&#8221;</p>
<p>Industry acquisitions boil down to who can build revenue scale to innovate and provision customizations in a SaaS architecture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Simon</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2011/04/26/quick-take-infor-and-golden-gate-gain-definitive-agreement-to-acquire-lawson-for-2b/comment-page-1/#comment-12031</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareinsider.org/?p=7590#comment-12031</guid>
		<description>Lawson as a product won’t go anywhere. Oracle still supports PS apps nearly a decade after its acquisition. People still work on Integral applications and that’s been defunct for much longer than that.

Lawson missed the boat on cloud computing, doing way too little way too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawson as a product won’t go anywhere. Oracle still supports PS apps nearly a decade after its acquisition. People still work on Integral applications and that’s been defunct for much longer than that.</p>
<p>Lawson missed the boat on cloud computing, doing way too little way too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

