Posts Tagged ‘users’

News Analysis: Spinnaker Expands JD Edwards Support With Versytec Acquisition

Versytec Acquisition Addresses Growing Demand For JD Edwards Support


Denver, Colorado based Spinnaker Management announced on March 6th, 2012 its acquisition of competitor Versytec.  For those who remember their third party maintenance (3PM) history, Versytec was among the first firms to announce third-party maintenance services within a year after PeopleSoft acquired JD Edwards in July 18, 2003.  Constellation estimates that Nashua, New Hampshire based Versytec had between 35 to 40 active 3PM customers.

Third-party maintenance describes support and maintenance offerings delivered by non-OEM providers. These vendors can provide a range of options from basic break/fix to bug fixes, performance optimization, tax and regulatory updates, and customization support. Keep in mind, 3PM does not provide access to upgrades and future versions of the OEM’s product. One big driver is the lower cost of delivery, as much as half the cost of the original vendor’s pricing.  Today most customers pay in maintenance and support the equivalent of a new license every 5 years without achieving the value.  For an average JD Edwards customer that upgrades every 15 years, that’s three times the cost of the original license cost.  In the latest Constellation research report, third party maintenance is one of many strategies to free up millions for customers to fund innovation.

The Spinnaker-Versytec deal is important for a few reasons:

  • Many JD Edwards customers seek alternatives to Oracle’s pricey maintenance fees. Software ownership costs continue to escalate as vendors accelerate their efforts to capture support and maintenance revenues.  From inquiries, surveys, and conversations on the ground, many Oracle JD Edwards World and EnterpriseOne ERP customers seek options to buy-time as they consider whether they upgrade or migrate from their current version.  Why?  Most JD Edwards customers run stable environments and do not gain any value from the Oracle one-size fits all 22% support policy.  Most customers seek phone support and tax and regulatory updates.
  • The market needs more options and choices in the third party maintenance market. Many OEM vendors have gone to the extreme to eliminate third-party options for their customers.  This anti-competitive behavior takes away choice for the customer. A bulked up Spinnaker creates a viable organization that has the critical mass to compete with Oracle.   The combined entity provides third party support services to an estimated 100 160 JD Edwards customers across the globe.
  • Spinnaker Support offers a different approach to third party maintenance. Spinnaker couples its third party maintenance options with consulting services providing a one-stop shop for JD Edwards customers.  Spinnaker also differentiates in its download methodology of customer entitled IP from Oracle.  Spinnaker provides customers with a checklist of what to download prior to migration off Oracle support.

The Bottom Line: Users Must Advocate for Third-Party Maintenance Rights Across the Technology Stack

More…

Research Summary: Best Practices – Three Simple Software Maintenance Strategies That Can Save You Millions

Forward And Commentary

Software ownership costs continue to escalate as vendors accelerate their efforts to capture support and maintenance revenues. Some vendors have gone to the extreme to eliminate third-party options for their customers. This best practices report examines three strategies to free up unnecessary costs to fund innovation and new projects.

A. Introduction

On average, IT budgets are down from 1-5 percent year-over-year, yet software support and maintenance costs continue to escalate ahead of inflation. Hence, continued pressure on IT budgets and a growing need for innovation projects have top business and technology leaders reexamining their software support and maintenance contracts for cost efficiencies.

Based on experience from over 1500 software contract negotiations, Constellation suggests three approaches to reduce the cost of software support and maintenance. Key strategies include third-party maintenance, shelfware reductions and unbundling maintenance contracts as part of every organization’s tech optimization strategy. Successful implementation can lead to savings from 10-25 percent of the IT budget, freeing up cash to fund innovation initiatives.

B. Research FindingsWhy Every Organization Should Consider Third-Party Maintenance, Shelfware Reductions and Unbundling Maintenance Contracts

Most organizations suffocate from the high and hidden cost of support and maintenance. On average, Constellation’s surveys reveal global IT budgets trending down from 1-5 percent year-over-year since 2008. Consumerization of IT, rapidly changing business models, and aging infrastructure have exposed the high cost of software support and maintenance. Because most organizations allocate from 60-85 percent of their budget to keeping the lights on, very little of the budget is left to spend on new projects (see Figure 1).

Organizations can unlock millions by considering third-party maintenance (3PM), reducing shelfware, and keeping support and maintenance contracts unbundled. Each strategy on its own creates opportunities to drive cost savings. All three strategies combined, provide a roadmap for funding innovation.

  1. Third-party maintenance (3PM) delivers the most immediate cost savings and opportunity for innovation. Third-party maintenance describes support and maintenance offerings delivered by non-OEM providers. These vendors can provide a range of options from basic break/fix to bug fixes, performance optimization, tax and regulatory updates, and customization support. Keep in mind, 3PM does not provide access to upgrades and future versions of the OEM’s product. One big driver is the lower cost of delivery, as much as half the cost of the original vendor’s pricing.  The report shows a survey of 268 respondents and why organizations choose 3PM and who the key vendors are.
  2. Reduction of shelfware remains a key pillar in legacy optimization strategies.  Shelfware (i.e. purchased software, not deployed, but incurring annual maintenance fees) is one of the biggest drains on operational expenses for enterprises. The simple definition of shelfware is software you buy and don’t use. For example, an organization that buys 1000 licenses of Vendor X’s latest ERP software and uses 905 licenses, becomes the proud owner of 95 licenses not being utilized. That’s 95 licenses of shelfware because the user will pay support and maintenance on the license whether or not they use the software or not.  The report details 4 successful and proven approaches.
  3. Unbundling maintenance contracts prevents future vendor mischief. About a decade back, vendors would offer support and maintenance as two separate line items on their contracts. Support would run about 5-10 percent of the license fee and so would maintenance. Keep in mind, average support and maintenance fees were under 15 percent back then. Unfortunately, many users have expressed a growing and concerning trend with support and maintenance contracts. Vendors concerns about support and maintenance contract retentions have led to new initiatives to consolidate contracts. At first glance, this may appear to be proactive and beneficial to customers, but the report details three rationales vendors provide and three strategies how to avoid bundling.

Figure 1. Visualizing the High Costs of Support And Maintenance

(Right-click to see full image)

More…

Research Summary: Market Overview – The Market For SAP Optimization Options

Forward And Commentary

This market overview provides a starting point to SAP customers seeking optimization solutions.  The document delivers actionable advice and insights into a proven collection of software solutions.  As part of the full series, best practices documents will follow with in- depth case studies and a critical product evaluation of this growing market of SAP optimization solutions. 

A. Introduction

With the average Global 2000 ERP deployment nearing 11.5 years in service, ERP customers face a significant challenge with updating their existing investments. Installed pre-Y2K, users have attempted to work around the best practices of the ‘90s while seeking innovation and application agility. Subsequently, SAP users face three main challenges:

  1. Higher cost of ownership that reduces overall ROI.
  2. An aging and brittle infrastructure that hampers innovation.
  3. Increasing complexity that hampers greater adoption.

B. Research Findings

As SAP customers choose their go- forward apps strategy, interviews from 100′s of clients show that four paths emerge (see Figure 1):
  1. Stay with status quo;
  2. Move to shiny new SAP.;
  3. Stabilize SAP and augment; and
  4. Modernize SAP and surround with best-of-breed.
Figure 1. The Four Paths Of SAP Optimization

 

Consequently, an $80.1 billion third-party SAP ecosystem has emerged to address nine key areas (details on each vendor in the official report):

Event Report: SAP Australian Users Group Summit 2010



SAUG Summit Delivered Great Networking Opportunities And Information Exchange

Over 550 attendees converged on Sydney August 3rd to 5th, 2010 for the annual SAP User Group Summit.  Members were treated to 28 session, 7 keynotes, and 4 SAP 101 educational sessions.  The smart design of the conference gave attendees ample opportunities to connect and share ideas between sessions.  Kudos to Kim Salter and team for a great event! In conversations with over 100 attendees, four trends emerged:

  • Excitement in putting Business Intelligence (BI) to work. A combination of pent up demand, SAP marketing of Business Objects, and early adopters of BW led to many interesting conversations about the future road map.  Users sought clarity on the future direction and for the most part received it around BEX support and future investments.  Many continued to wonder if SAP would clean up its master data management strategy and address the need for a stronger next generation BI platform.
  • Considerable interest in how the Cloud can be used with existing SAP investments. Several sessions on the cloud were given.  Jeff Word, President of SAP Product Strategy provided an SAP Session on Cloud Computing.  The 6th  keynote on “Ready for the Cloud and SaaS?” provided users with 10 strategies to use Cloud Computing with or without SAP.  With so much confusion on Cloud terminology, attendees wanted a reset on the definitions and categories of cloud computing.  In each conversation, cost savings and flexibility drove the interest to consider cloud options.  A good mix of both technology and business leaders instigated the conversations.  Considerable disappointment emerged when they found out Business by Design would not be available to Australia until late 2011.
  • Concern about negotiating leverage in SAP contracts. In both the CIO session and in passing conversations, the majority of attendees expressed a concern about waning leverage in contract negotiations for the acquisition of new licenses or dealing with maintenance fees.  A few attendees expressed frustration that the SAP Australia head office ignored them when their contracts were written by the corporate entities in countries abroad.  They felt that SAP should act with one face to the world.
  • Questions on when to upgrade. Many attendees expressed concern on when to upgrade.  A large number on 4.6 and 4.7 saw no need to make the shift yet despite a few key features in Enhancement Packages.  In fact, many of these users augmented the gaps with SaaS solutions today in expense management, CRM, business intelligence, and strategic HCM.

A photo collage of the event can be seen below (see Figure 1):

More…

Monday’s Musings: Why Users Must Preserve Their Third Party Maintenance Rights

Apps Users Seek Third Party Maintenance For Cost, Value, and Service

Updated surveys from inquiries, client conversations, and user group meetings show a 113.8% increase in interest in third party maintenance (3PM) services from Q3 2009 to Q1 2010 (see Figure 1).  Key factors stem from (see Figure 2.):

  • Continuing cost pressures. Budgets continue to be at flat or have been reduced.  Organizations must do more with less.  Add pressures to innovate, CIO’s must find fat without trimming bone.
  • Gaining minimal value in maintenance services. Most felt they were paying too much for too little.  An 8 point jump reemphasized the issue with a lack of tiered offerings.
  • Declining plans to upgrade. Worsening economic conditions from Q3 2009 to Q1 2010 led a 27 point increase in interest in 3PM.  Expect many respondents to change their point of view (POV) as economic conditions improve.
  • Expecting better service. Service continues to play a key factor in decisions to go to 3PM.  Over 60% of respondents had experienced poor levels of service.
  • Slowing pace of vendor innovation. Greater than half of respondents believe their vendor has been too slow to deliver new capabilities. These include SaaS deployment options or key functionality in areas such as strategic HCM and social CRM.
  • Disliking the vendor. About 1/3 of the survey respondents have bad experiences with their vendor.  Many times it comes from sales person or support rep experiences.
  • Delivering self support. Almost 30% of respondents already provide their own support.  These organizations have no need to pay maintenance when they are doing all the work.

Figure 1. Interest in 3PM grows 113.8% over 2 quarters.

screen-shot-2010-02-20-at-44436-pm

Figure 2. Cost Pressures, Value, And Decision Not To Upgrade Drive Current Trends to 3PM

screen-shot-2010-02-20-at-44448-pm

Limited Options Exist For Most Enterprise Apps Customers

Of the 101 respondents in Q1 2010 interested in 3PM, Oracle (88.1%) and SAP (76.2%) users expressed the greatest interest in seeking independent services (see Figure 3).  Over 80% of the users were from large companies greater than 1000 employees across the globe.  Most SAP users surveyed have mixed environments with Siebel, JD Edwards, and PeopleSoft joint installations.  Unfortunately, very few public options exist for sole SAP users (see Figure 4).  For example, SAP customers can only turn to Rimini Street.  Oracle customers on PeopleSoft, JD Edwards, and Siebel also have limited choices with Rimini Street, netCustomer, and Spinnaker among the options.  IBM, Infor, Lawson, Computer Associates, Epicor, Microsoft Dynamics, Oracle E-Business Suite and database customers have no options.  (Note: This data may not be completely statistically significant given the sample size of 240, but hopefully it provides some directional input.)

Figure 3. Oracle And SAP Users Drive Interest In 3PM

screen-shot-2010-02-20-at-44457-pm

Figure 4. Very Few Public Options Exist For Customers

screen-shot-2010-02-20-at-100912-pm

The Bottom Line For Users – Users And User Groups Must Band Together To Guarantee 3PM Rights. Don’t Take These For Granted!

Although the latest surveys show a 17 point increase in the belief that 3PM is a right, this right is under fire by big vendors such as Oracle who have taken legal actions against 3PM providers for improperly (i.e. TomorrowNow) and allegedly (i.e. Rimini Street) violating intellectual property rights.  If providers have violated such laws, Oracle rightfully should defend its positions and those providers be punished.  However, there’s a lot of money at stake.  For most vendors, maintenance represents 50% to 80% of their revenue stream.  Consequently, users and user groups have a responsibility to:

  • Demand that their contracts include provisions that protect their right to 3PM
  • Require vendors to work out rules on how 3PM providers can deliver services without violating software IP provisions
  • Seek anti-trust class action with the US DOJ (i.e. Christine A. Varney) and the EU Compeition (i.e. Joaquín Almunia) against software vendors who hinder 3PM providers from providing services

Users and user groups must vigorously defend their positions in contracts and legal action or lose this right.  Failure will result in a continued software maintenance monopoly.  Success will ensure market competition and renewed innovation.  Attention: OAUG, Quest, and SUGEN leadership your members need your help!

Figure 5.  A Growing Body Of Users Believe 3PM Is A Right

screen-shot-2010-02-20-at-44509-pm

The Bottom Line For Vendors – Proactively Address The Issue Or Expect A Groundswell Of Activism

SaaS, subscription pricing, 3PM, and the economy provide a confluence of forces that will continue to attack maintenance revenue streams.  Many legal cases have been fought over this issue including IBM vs Amdahl and Geac vs Grace ConsultingSAP’s failed attempt to convince customers on the value of Enterprise Support led to a public relations disaster and a factor in the resignation of their CEO.  The result – many vendors considering price hikes held back.  In fact, some savvy software vendors retooled and restored the client -vendor relationship by:

  • Offering more entry points and tiers to support options. The three pillars of software maintenance and support policies still apply.  However, several vendors are now offering more tiers of support as lower entry points.  Two vendors have finalized plans to offer just the bare bones legal and regulatory updates.  Other vendors have made it easier to come back with maintenance amnesty plans.
  • Providing flexible maintenance policies. Vendors who change rigid policies have experienced success among customers.  Some Both Infor through Infor Flex and Micrsoft Dynamics allow like for like swap credits to migrate between existing products.
  • Renegotiating existing terms. Some vendors are helping clients meet the realities of the current market conditions. Big on the list is helping clients address shelf ware without repricing of contracts.  For clients who paid full maintenance on software that’s at least 4 years old, some vendors are offering to reduce up to 20% of the overall licenses not in use.  This leads to lower maintenance revenue but engenders good will among key clients.  Further, several vendors have allowed clients to apply credit towards another module as an alternative.
  • Delivering amnesty programs. Several vendors have allowed customers to return to maintenance programs after years of not paying.  Such programs play a key role in helping customers upgrade but should be used sparingly as customers may become accustomed to this practice.
  • Creating better peer forums to share information. Almost every vendor surveyed has a program to improve the online support capabilities.  Applying Social CRM use cases,  user generated content in peer forums tops the list of initiatives.  Other plans focus on sharing data on benchmarks, operational metrics, and best practices.
  • Assisting with vendor financing. Clients seek access to financing, especially many in the mid-market who’s credit lines have been zapped.  Microsoft has led the charge by providing 0% financing for its Microsoft Dynamics ERP and Microsoft Dynamics CRM Customers.  Other vendors such as IBM, Infor, Oracle, SAP, Sage also offer vendor led financing programs that include hardware, implementation, training, and other services.
  • Lowering cost of usage and ownership. Though tops on the list as a conceptual practice, most vendors will need to roll out such initiatives over the next 24 months.  A few notable exceptions include Agresso with its VITA architecture which allows customers to rapidly make business and UI changes, Microsoft Dynamics customers who report back significantly lowered implementation and training costs compared to most vendors, and Epicor customers who report significant productivity gains with Service Connect.  SaaS customers already experience such gains.

Your POV

Take the new and improved survey on 3rd party maintenance and let us know if you need help with your enterprise apps strategy by:

  • Conducting an ROI on 3rd party maintenance options
  • Identifying cost reduction opportunities
  • Renegotiating your software contracts
  • Improving innovation via SaaS and other deployment options

Please post or send on to rwang0 at gmail dot com or r at softwaresinsider dot org and we’ll keep your anonymity.

Related resources and links

20091008 Deal Architect – Vinnie Mirchandani “Third Party Maintenance Is Really 4 Decades Old”

20071120 News Analysis: Too Early to Call the Death of Third Party Maintenance

20090210 Tuesday’s Tip: Software Licensing and Pricing – Do Not Give Away Your Third Party Maintenance And Access Rights

20090709 Tuesday’s Tip: Do Not Bundle Your Support and Maintenance Contracts!

20090622 News Analysis: Infor Flex Reflects Proactive Maintenance Policy

20090516 News Analysis: Rimini Street Launches Third Party Maintenance for SAP

20090504 News Analysis: Oracle Waives Fees On Extended Support Offerings

20080909 Trends: What Customers Want From Maintenance And Support

20080215 Software Licensing and Pricing: Stop the Anti-Competitive Maintenance Fee Madness

20090428 News Analysis: SAP and SUGEN Make Progress on Enterprise Support

20090405 Monday’s Musings: Total Account Value, True Cost of Ownership, And Software Vendor Business Models

20090330 Monday’s Musings: It’s The Relationship, Stupid! (Part 2) – Stop Slashing The Quality Of Support And Maintenance

20090324 Tuesday’s Tips: Five Simple Steps To Reduce Your Software Maintenance Costs

20090223 Monday’s Musings: Five Programs Some Vendors Have Implemented To Help Clients In An Economic Recession

20081012 Monday’s Musings: 5 Steps to Restoring Trust in the Vendor – Customer Relationship

20100114 News Analysis: SAP Revives Two Tier Maintenance Options

20091012 Research Report: Customer Bill of Rights – Software-as-a Service

20090912 News Analysis: Siemens Cancels SAP Maintenance Contract

20090910 Tuesday’s Tip: Note To Self – Start Renegotiating Your Q4 Software Maintenance Contracts Now!

20090602 Tuesday’s Tip: Now’s The Time To Consider SaaS Software Escrows

Copyright © 2010 R Wang and Insider Associates, LLC. All rights reserved.

Tuesday’s Tip: The SAP Optimization List – Key Ecosystem Vendors You Should Know

High Cost Of Ownership And Changing Requirements Drive SAP Users To Seek Optimization Solutions

As users await SAP to regain its mojo (see Dennis Howlett’s post) and implement it’s “Voice of the Customer” strategy in 2010, users must continue to reduce their cost of ownership and complexity (see Figure 1).  In addition, rapidly changing business requirements require some users to seek SaaS alternatives, additional point solutions, and extensions.

Figure 1.  Cost Reduction Top of Mind for SAP users

What SAP users want from SAP

Consequently, vendors providing SAP optimization and extension solutions represent one of the fastest growing parts of the $78.7B (2009 Altimeter Group estimate), 850,000 person strong SAP service partner and developer ecosystem.   SAP users already embrace many of the solutions from vendors on this inaugural SAP Optimization List as part of their business value oriented apps strategy. The living list covers seven areas including:

  1. application extension and usability;
  2. application life cycle management;
  3. archiving, storage, and data management;
  4. license management and optimization;
  5. Microsoft Office integration;
  6. third party maintenance; and
  7. virtualization

1. Application Extension and Usability

Users often complain about the poor usability of SAP solutions.  These solutions allow users to change their user experience with SAP.  In some cases, the solutions provide composite app creation capabilities in other tool sets to inter-operate with SAP.

  • Adobeprovides interactive forms for the SAP environment in both an off-line and on-line deployment.  Submitted forms are then entered into SAP.  Forms can include validations and other secure features.
  • ERP-Linkallows users to extend the SAP environment for business intelligence, document management, content management, and composite application creation using Microsoft tools.  The i_Net platform creates SAP-Microsoft interoperability.
  • GuiXTprovides users with the ability to deliver customized user interfaces in SAP applications.  GuiXT is often used by clients to simplify screens and user flows without impacting SAP code.

2. Application Life Cycle Management

Whether it may be instance consolidation, upgrades, test data management, or performance planning, these vendors ease the process of managing the SAP application life cycle.

  • Hayes Technologyassists customers with replicating production application data for dev, testing, and training environments.  Gold Client allows organizations to replicate the data sets they need in SAP configuration, master data, and transcational data.
  • Hyperformix - builds on SAP internal monitoring capability.   Organizations gain a performance monitoring tool that identifies hardware, infrastructure, and architecture optimization opportunities.
  • Intellicorpprovides an artificial intelligence based optimization solution called Live Compare that compares version of SAP for use in testing, upgrade planning, and other life cycle activities. The solution helps clients understand their pre and post environment.
  • Panayadelivers a SaaS based optimization tool for SAP upgrades, enhancement packages, and ABAP code cleansing.  Customers generate a code analysis to determine differentials between versions.  The tool proactively tells user what will break, how to fix it, and where to test.
  • Tidal Softwareoptimizes the allocation of SAP support resources through a root cause analysis methodology.  Performance, IT Process, and Workload automation solutions address both day to day and upgrade scenarios such as a system refresh.
  • West Trax – uses a benchmark tool based on over 300 clients in 13 industries to determine system optimization opportunities for upgrades and  consolidations.  KPI Scan, KPI Optimizer, and KPI QA help organizations identify opportunities, make suggestions, and assist with compliance.

3. Archiving, Storage, and Data Management

  • EMC – provides content management and archiving solutions to support compliance requirements.  Other capabilities include cloning, backup, and recovery, and information protection.
  • IBM Optimdelivers a suite of integrated data management solutions that includes data privacy, test data management, archiving, retention and E-discovery, and upgrade consolidations.

4. License Management and Optimization

Solutions in this category focus on helping clients manage their license usage.  Many large enterprises lack the understanding of how much shelfware may be in production.  In addition, the used software market provides users with opportunities to unload or acquire older releases of software.

  • Flexera (formerly Acresso, Macrovision) - helps clients with a software solution to understand usage, ensure compliance, centralize updates, predict future demand, and improve contract negotiation leverage.
  • SUSEN Softwareprovides a market place to buy and sell used software or shelfware.
  • UsedSoft - supports a market place to buy and sell used software or shelfware.

5. Microsoft Office Integration

Organizations require easy ways to leverage Microsoft Office as an interface into SAP.  Common scenarios include Outlook, Excel, Access, and Word integration.

  • SAP Duetrepresents a solution in joint partnership between Microsoft and SAP to provide interoperability.  Current users complain about the slow pace of innovation and high cost.  A new version addressing these issues will be out in 2010.
  • Winshuttlefacilitates data exchange between SAP and Microsoft Excel or Access.   Winshuttle’s data management tools automate data entry, data download, and reporting tasks for the entire SAP BusinessSuite 7.

6. Third party maintenance

Customers seeking relief from maintenance choose solutions that provide maintenance, tax updates, and regulatory changes for often half the cost of existing SAP maintenance prices.  The clear leader in the market is Rimini Street though some other system integrators have been quietly providing such services.

  • Rimini Street- delivers maintenance options for SAP customers who do not seek to upgrade but would like to keep their existing systems up to date with tax, compliance, and other break-fix issues.  Rimini Street’s charter program has met significant success with over 100 client cases for SAP customers.
  • Your System Integrator of Choice – The recent Siemens SAP maintenance contract negotiations revealed that other vendors such as IBM and HCL were bidding for the maintenance business.   Many SoftwareInsider readers have shared with us that many system integrators, especially those in Europe provide such services.

7. Virtualization

Virtualization allows organizations to consolidate server infrastructure costs for development, testing, training, and production environments.

  • EMC – provides virtualization solutions that include high availability (HA), backup and recovery (BR), and cloning.
  • VMWare -  reduces an organizations physical infrastructure footprint with its solutions.  VMWare provides additional solutions that deliver high availability (HA) and disaster recovery (DR).  In addition to cost savings, many Software Insider readers report performance improvements.

The Bottom Line – Lots Of Proven Solutions, Expect More Details In Future Friday’s Features

Over the course of the next 6 months, we will be profiling many of these vendors.  Key questions that will be answered:

  1. What’s the appropriate use case?
  2. What other customers have used these solutions?
  3. What are sample ROI’s achieved?

Meanwhile, let’s see what news, programs, and innovations develop at SAP’s Field Kickoff Meeting (FKOM 2010) the third week of January.

Your POV.

Have you worked with any of these vendors?  Feel free to share your experiences.  Am I missing anyone?  This list will be continuously updated so please share with us your thoughts.  Feel free to post your comments here or send me an email at rwang0 at gmail dot com or r at softwareinsider dot org.

Copyright © 201o R Wang and Insider Associates, LLC. All rights reserved.

News Analysis: DSAG Project Team Members Resign Leadership of SUGEN KPI Working Group

DSAG project team and project leader departure could signal disagreement with methodology not SUGEN

SAP embarked on an ambitious program to prove value in its Enterprise Support fee hike last year.   As planned, SAP should announce the results for the first set of SUGEN KPI’s in early December.  However, two key SUGEN KPI project sponsors (revised 11/30/2009) team members have left from the German SAP user group (DSAG).  Confirmed by a spokeswoman to IDG News Service on November 27th, 2009, both project leader Andreas Oczko and project sponsor Otto Schell resigned from their roles on November 18th.  Several outcomes may potentially have led to this departure:

  1. The methodology used by the auditing firm (Gartner Consulting) could be quite inconsistent
  2. Teams may not have had enough time to review the data to check for statistical errors.
  3. The KPI’s measured were only the first set, not the complete set.
  4. A few months does not provide enough trending data
  5. SAP’s attempting to announce results prior to when 90%+ of its maintenance renewal occurs in Q4

To be clear, DSAG remains a SUGEN member and has not pulled out of the group or project.  The leadership members have just left the project and have been active with the SUGEN group on other projects and issues.

SAP Should Still Be Given Credit For Undertaking A Huge Endeavor

Despite attempting to raise get away with a large (revised 11/30/2009) maintenance fees hike in the middle of one of the worst global recessions, the SUGEN agreement with SAP is a good faith gesture and a step in the right direction.  While this is not a legally binding agreement, the deal calls for SAP to limit increases until demonstrable results from the KPI’s have been achieved.  This is not an easy challenge but a few props should go out to SAP because:

  1. SAP’s embarking on a risky but unique program to show value
  2. Benchmarking 100 global customers against 10/11 KPI’s creates data consistency challenges
  3. Agreeing to present results in the face of public opinion takes courage

The Bottom Line For Users -  Remain Vigilant And Compare SUGEN Results With Your Own

SAP customers should work with their user groups to understand the methodology used and gain access to the underlying data with these 100 customers.  Keep in mind SAP’s Value Academy already has benchmarking data for a broader set of customers.  The result – selection of the 100 customers by the user groups will significantly impact the outcome.  Users should see how their situation fares compared to the benchmarks to gauge their own potential value achieved from SAP’s Enterprise Support

The Bottom Line For Vendors – Provide Customers With Tiered Maintenance Plans

Pressures from SaaS deployments and mid-market competitors will erode the 70 to 80% margins in maintenance fees.  Customers will begin to demand third party maintenance options and include such protections in future contracts.  Those vendors who keep tiered maintenance based on the life of the product in production will engender the most loyalty by providing customers with the right balance between sustaining maintenance and incentives to upgrade.  At the end of the day, customers have to migrate on their own terms.  Maintenance fees should reflect the value that customers receive and not be an impediment in the client – vendor relationship.

Your POV.

If you get a chance, let us know:

  • Which SAP products do you use?
  • What do you think about the progress on SUGEN KPI’s?
  • Are you considering alternatives to SAP?
  • Do you feel SAP is innovating fast, ok, or slow enough?

Feel free to post your comments here or send me an email at rwang0 at gmail dot com or r at softwareinsider dot org.

Copyright © 2009 R Wang and Insider Associates, LLC. All rights reserved.

Speaker Notes: Keynote – SAP UK & Ireland User Group Conference 2009

Building Innovation With And Around Your SAP Environment

Location: Manchester CentralAuditorium
Date:23/11/2009
Start Time: 16:25
End Time: 17:00
Speaker: R “Ray” Wang
Company: Partner with Altimeter Group

Keynote summary:

  1. Pace of change continues to increase in market forces, work dynamics, business models, and pace of technology adoption.
  2. Innovation is essential in this market.
  3. There’s a tonne of innovation at SAP. Management and politics keep it from coming out.
  4. Users need to tap into innovations from SAP and also help SAP prioritize what should go to market.
  5. Users need to know what you want to do before you even talk to SAP.  Get your act together.
  6. Use the user group to build the linkages to SAP.  This is a better, more productive approach, especially if you are not a top 400 customer with private access.
  7. SAP isn’t bad or good. You can’t view them that way. Management is confused at the moment on leadership, direction, and innovation so figure out what you need from them early and fast.
  8. If SAP can’t do it, you don’t have time to wait for them, especially if there’s no commitment. SaaS is an option, other providers are out there.  Come back to them later when they figure it out.
  9. The pace of change is too fast. Technology adoption too slow. Companies need to keep moving in innovation.
  10. Invest in innovation even if it hurts. Find money to optimize and pay for this.  There are a number of vendors that can assist.

Members of the SAP UK &I user group who would like a copy of the presentation can contact David Stanley, Vice President of Business Development and Sales at david@altimetergroup.com for copies.   Your member number will be required for proof.

Video Highlights – Exposing SAP Innovation


Courtesy of Dennis Howlett

Video Highlights – On ESME vs Salesforce.com Chatter


Courtesy of Dennis Howlett.

Video Highlights – 5 Recent Failures of SAP


Courtesy of Dennis Howlett.

Copyright © 2009 R Wang and Insider Associates, LLC. All rights reserved.

Additional coverage and related links

Event Report: UK & Ireland User Group Conference 2009

Event Report: SAP UK & Ireland User Group Conference 2009

SAP users in UK and Ireland remain equally skeptical about SAP

(Photos by R Wang & Insider Associates, LLC.   Copyright © 2009 All rights reserved.)

The SAP user group hosted its annual event.  Conversations with 37 clients reflect the following broad trends in the UK and Ireland:

  • SAP users remain skeptical about benefits promised by SAP due to lack of delivery over the past 5 years (See Figure 1.)
  • SAP has spent more time reaching out to customers to understand pain points
  • Knowledge gaps continue to exist between what SAP users know about SAP and what SAP sales people communicate to clients
  • A show of hands in the audience validates conversations that SAP users have not adopted NetWeaver, Duet, ByD, Solution Manager, and Enterprise Support.
  • Many customers have budget but need trusted advice as to what is possible in including SAP in their future roadmaps
  • Customers seek innovation from SAP but find a difficult time understanding what SAP has to offer
  • Many customers have turned to other providers for innovations via SaaS or cost optimization

Figure 1. What SAP Customers Want

What SAP users want from SAP

The bottom line.

SAP users and their user groups have a unique opportunity to put in the right infrastructure to engage in productive partnership with SAP.  The management team has shifted their outlook.  Early signs indicate a more customer focused approach may be on the way.  Customers seeking to innovate within their SAP investment should ask hard questions about what is in the SAP Labs portfolio.  User groups will play a key role in helping to prioritize future SAP product road map investments.  Users and their user groups should push for frameworks that monitor customer reuqests and increase transparency in the prioritization process. Customers can not allow SAP to squander any more of the 10′s of billions in maintenance fee and license fees “invested” with SAP.

Your POV.

If you get a chance, let us know:

  • Which SAP products do you use?
  • When will you migrate to BS7 or ECC 6.0?
  • What do you think about the progress on SUGEN KPI’s
  • Are you considering alternatives to SAP
  • Do you feel SAP is innovating fast, ok, or slow enough?

Feel free to post your comments here or send me an email at rwang0 at gmail dot com or r at softwareinsider dot org.

Copyright © 2009 R Wang and Insider Associates, LLC. All rights reserved.

Additional coverage and related links

Product Review: Epicor 9 Delivers Next Generation Apps Capabilities Today

Epicor Succeeds On Delivering A Converged Product Line

Epicor’s latest release, Epicor 9, provides a proof point that an acquisition intensive vendor can keep their promises to both acquire and deliver on innovation.  Under the themes of “Protect, Extend, and Converge”, the Irvine, CA based mid-market software provider committed to its customers to support prior releases, standardize key apps and infrastructure to deliver common solutions, and complete a super set solution.

Epicor 9 became generally available (GA) as of December 10th, 2008.  After almost 11 months in the market, most customers and prospects confirm that Epicor has delivered on their three promises.  More importantly, they have achieved a converged super set of solutions from Avante, Clientele, DataFlo, Enterprise, Manage 2000, ManFact, iScala, Vista, and Vantage.  Key suites in Epicor 9 include:

  • Financial management
  • Customer relationship management (CRM)
  • Sales management
  • Production management
  • Supply chain management (SCM)
  • Planning and scheduling
  • Product data management
  • Service management
  • Human capital management (HCM)
  • Enterprise performance management (EPM)

Point of view (POV):  Epicor’s business strategy to grow via acquisition may seem to mirror the business models of Oracle, Infor, and Sage.  However, Epicor is the first to deliver on a converged solution while supporting all existing releases.  This is no small feat as the first phase of convergence brings together the largest base of its acquired products.  In addition, Epicor consolidates a multitude of Microsoft and Progress technology platforms via ICE 2.0, an SOA based foundational middleware.  Epicor rolled out Epicor 9 with significant beta testing from 70 customers and 13 partners.

Phase 2 of the convergence strategy will most likely involve the Epicor Retail line and Epicor’s Enterprise Services Automation.  Other details of Phase 2 may involve greater adoption of the Azure platform for delivery in a Software plus Services model.

ICE Architecture Bridges The Gap Between Web 2.0 Innovations And Enterprise Class Requirements

ICE 2.0 is Epicor’s business architecture built to SOA design principles and Web 2.0 sensibilities.  As a next generation middleware, ICE 2.0 separates the applications layer from the presentation and logic layers – enabling flexibility to update and modify the middleware and presentation layer at separate times from the applications through different release cycles.  Server and client logic outputs as business services that can be made available and modified by users.  These loosely coupled business services improve connectivity and integration and carries critical XML metadata.  Users benefit from much desired Web 2.0 capabilities that support application to application integration and business to business collaboration (see Figure 1).

Figure 1.  Epicor Innovations Stem From Strong Middleware Foundation In ICE 2.0

<iframe align=center src=http://www.flickr.com/slideShow/index.gne?user_id=35408001@N04&set_id=72157614091349617&detail=yes frameBorder=0 scrolling=no width=500 height=450></iframe>
(Source: Epicor Software)

Consequently, ICE 2.0 delivers on many of the 10 elements of Social Enterprise Apps and includes dynamic user experiences, business process focus, and community connectedness.  Key tools include a technology platform based in Microsoft .NET and business logic via Progress’ Open Edge offering.   On the usability front, Epicor 9 addresses role based design, consistent experiences, and contextual and relevant delivery of information through:

  • Improved user experience.  Epicor 9 takes advantage of new Microsoft Office UI/UX paradigms and portal design elements to provide themes, styles, skins, tooltip controls, drag-and-drop designs, and floating palettes & previews.  Users may also drill into and around reports and data. Key personalization features include favorite groups, sheet and toolbar layouts, options windows, short cut bars, and a theme maintenance wizard.

    POV: Users immediately gravitate towards the Office- styled ribbons.  Leveraging the XML schema, Epicor Portal enables role specific content and allows users to craft queries and personalize access to information.  Personalization capabilities smartly tie back to the user ID and persist throughout all solutions.

  • Consistent user experience. Regardless of the user interface, customization and user personalization remains intact because everything starts from the same meta data.  Consequently, Epicor 9 can run on a C#.NET Smart Client, any web client, and mobile devices on platforms such as Blackberry, Windows Mobile, Symbian, and Apple iPhone

    POV: Epicor’s Everywhere Framework smartly stores client business logic as XML metadata and generates AJAX base forms.  This allows client agnostic rendering of the apps in any UI presentation layer and personalization format using the same source code.  The result – a consistent user experience across any channel and even operating system.

  • Business Activity Management (BAM). BAM tools enable users to track changes, create even triggers, and send alerts based on parameters and rules.  Out of the box, Epicor 9 supports auto print reports or labels, BAM rules, change logs, custom global alerts, and custom procedure extensions.

    POV: BAM tools provide contextual and relevant delivery of information across the enterprise.  By being able to monitor changes to database fields and tables, useful alerts can be set up for scenarios such as a customer exceeding a credit limit, a workflow approval that’s on hold because of a approver’s vacation, or the automation of defined and common outcomes.

  • Software-as-a-Service.  Customers can choose among various deployment options from on-premise, hosted, to multi-tenant SaaS.  Epicor 9 is designed to support multi-tenancy and metadata configuration.

    POV: Today’s mid-market organizations share strong opinions on whether or not to take a SaaS deployment option or stay on-premise.  For this reason, Epicor wisely offers a choice to its customer.  Unlike most of Epicor’s competitors, Epicor 9 delivers a true SaaS solution because it supports multiple customers sharing a single shared instance.

On the business process side, Epicor 9 meets key criteria in configurability and adaptability, outcome focused & results oriented, and proactive – predictive – actionable categories with:

  • Business process management (BPM). Epicor BPM exposes all business services so customers can apply business rules, monitor actions, and modify processes.  The system uses a Microsoft Outlook style rules engine which allows business users to make changes without painful customization or coding. Users can define actions, condition statements, holds, and set data triggers.

    POV: Next generation apps utilize BPM tools to enforce controls and enhance policies and processes.  Epicor provides a rich BPM tool that not only extends base capabilities without customizations but also saves time and money by reusing common established processes.  Existing users find the system easy to use and note the ease of use with HTML e-mail formats, Microsoft .NET Action Content, Property Bag Support, and XML Data Nodes.

  • Epicor Service Connect. Using the graphical workflow designer, users can map out and modify business processes.   The system automates business processes such as task assignments, logical routing, and human interaction points.  Epicor Service Connect delivers on message based SOA through XML messages and mapping and leaving a complete audit trail.

    POV: Customers who have used Service Connect rave about the ease of use in copying and sharing common processes.  The system makes these changes without modifying source code and the Visio-like usability is key to its successful adoption.  Customers benefit from BPM without the complexity.

  • Role based dashboards provide actionable insight. Users are treated to a series of role based interactive dashboards.  Dashboards take advantage of Microsoft UI metaphors such as the outlook navigation pane and ribbons. Users can drill into and around data, export to excel, make changes, and come back to the same screens. Role based security at the field level ensures the protection of confidential information.  More importantly, the dashboards support offline disconnected scenarios as well as mobile EPM delivery.

    POV: Users immediately find value in the support for ad-hoc reports, monitoring tools, workbenches, and alerting capabilities.  Existing Epicor users will take for granted the large number of out of the box reports.  New customers will be surprised by the quality and relevance of the 100 dashboards and 250+ key performance indicators (KPIs).

On the community connectedness end, Epicor 9 meets many of the key criteria to engage stakeholders, foster collaboration, and provide enterprise class security via:

  • Epicor Information Worker integrates with Microsoft Office technologies.  Information worker usability leverages Office Business Applications.   Users improve access to business data through this desktop productivity solution and can work in native applications such as Outlook, Word, and Excel. Other key features include disconnected lists and offline transaction support.

    POV: Most users expect Microsoft Office integration but remain disappointed with what’s been delivered by most vendors to date.  Clients express amazement with the ability to use Epicor Portal to work within Office and execute actions that propagate into Epicor 9.

  • Epicor Enterprise Search.  The solution builds off of Microsoft Search capabilities such as SQL Full Text indexing to return structured results such as Epicor data and unstructured information such as a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Search results can be ordered by relevance and tuned to meet role based requirements and priorities.   Key features include advanced searches, business activity query searches, named searches, and user configurable quick searches.

    POV: Users gain quicker access to information resulting in increased productivity and knowledge sharing.  Existing clients enjoy the tag clouds and ability to directly access the application from the search results.

  • Epicor Presence and RSS.  Out of the box support for really simple syndication (RSS) feeds gives users the ability to consume information at their own pace.  Support for presence will enable collaboration via tools such as instant messaging (IM).  Key containers include the Windows Gadgets and the Outlook Syndicated Content Directory within Microsoft Office.

    POV: With growing use in mobile form factors, expect presence capabilities to play a greater role as next generation apps incorporate this design element.  Support for RSS feeds delivers on a key Enterprise 2.0 capability representative of next generation apps.  Most users will access this via the Epicor Portal or Outlook to monitor any changes to subscribed topics or sources.

Layered Client Stack In ICE 2.0 Provides Flexibility Across Markets, Sizes, and Industries

The Epicor layered client stack provides a key framework for organizations and partners to make modifications regardless of business size, country and industries.  The seven levels include:

  1. Base Form – provides the foundational source
  2. Productization – allows different editions of Epicor 9 to be created
  3. Verticalization – stores industry specific functionality and terminology
  4. Localization – delivers geo specific capabilities and terminology
  5. Extension – gives partners and orgs the ability to change look and feel
  6. Customization – supports standard customization capabilities
  7. Personalization – allows end users to make modifications to their environment

POV:  Through the layered stack, Partners and companies claim that Epicor 9 is easy to modify and provides a strong framework to deliver last-mile solutions.  Technically inclined business users can also use Epicor Composite Applications to create mash-ups that bring web forms, analytical web parts, search queries into a portal served up in Microsoft Office SharePoint Server.   Key industries with deep support include:

  • Aerospace and defense
  • Automotive
  • Consumer goods
  • Distribution
  • Electronics and electrical equipment
  • Fabricated metals
  • Financial services
  • Furniture and fixtures
  • Industrial machinery
  • Measuring and controlling devices
  • Medical devices
  • Primary metals
  • Rubber and plastics
  • Stone, clay, glass, and concrete

Epicor 9 Designed For Organizations With Global Requirements And Ambitions

Epicor 9 provides growing mid-market companies, subsidiaries of large enterprises, and aspiring ventures capabilities to conduct global commerce.  Key capabilities include:

  • Global Engines. Epicor ships a number of global engines designed to support global deployment and adoption.  Using a series of interlocking global engines, configuration rules determine postings, regulatory support, tax rules, rounding, books, and multi-currency.  For example, the global posting engine provides rule based capability.  The global tax engine supports country and local specific tax rules.

    P
    OV: With each country roll-out and localization, Epicor enables the mid-market organization to span geographies while meeting key regulatory and local requirements.  Even domestic companies with expansion aspirations will gain the capacity to truly conduct global business.
  • Global Capabilities. On the localization front, the solution currently supports 18+ languages for 30+ countries delivering unicode and double byte support throughout the product.  Mulit-currency addresses exchange rate effective dates and multi-book integration.  Multi-company supports intercompany requirements.  User’s can determine their language as a personalization preference.

    POV: Epicor currently supports a limited number of localizations with a goal of 30 languages in 50 countries by 2010.  However, partners have been able to cost-effectively and rapidly deliver on localizations due to the configurability of Epicor 9.

  • Global Multisite Management. Organizations with federated production or distribution capabilities and centralized shared services can take advantage of the multisite capabilities for key areas such as financial consolidation, forecasts, inter-company trading, plant scheduling, and global customer management.  Multisite management allows customers to synchronize master data and goods across multiple sites.

    POV: Multisite capabilities are often provided as workarounds.  Epicor’s approach applies an SOA philosophy to supporting this level of complexity.  Support for visibility across multiple facilities gives Epicor 9 the ability to move into the large enterprise space over time.

Customer feedback to date has been mostly positive.

As with each new release, beta customer often find the bugs and unexpected deployment issues.  Most complaints about Epicor 9 come from clients who chose to self implement or provide a considerable amount of implementation resources.  Not surprisingly, early issues focused on a need for more detailed documentation, best practices, and Microsoft technology skill sets required to self deploy.  With almost a year under their belt, newer customers have mostly expressed satisfaction with the productivity gains, ease of use, and ability to scale up as their business expands.

The Bottom Line For Customers – Consider Epicor 9 For Mid-Market Organizations And Subsidiaries/Divisions of Large Enterprises

Continued enterprise software vendor consolidation has resulted in limited choices for enterprise.  Vendors such as Epicor who acquire, streamline, and adequately reinvest will most likely emerge as leaders in their markets.  Epicor 9 provides customers seeking an alternative to large enterprise apps force fit to meet mid-market requirements.  As customers consider replacement strategies for old generation enterprise apps, Epicor 9 should be considered in short lists for vendor selection.  Organizations betting on Microsoft platforms will also want to evaluate other offerings built on Microsoft .NET tools and technologies to gauge their level of adoption and sophistication.  In general Epicor meets the key needs that SMB organizations have expressed (see Figure 2.)

Figure 2. Mid-market organizations seek enterprise class solutions but lack the resources to support complex deployments

screen-shot-2009-10-24-at-82008-am

The Bottom Line For Vendors – Middleware Matters, Invest or Perish

Enablement of Social Enterprise Apps and their related Enterprise 2.0 capabilities require rich middleware platforms.  In each advancement from mainframe, mini-computer, client server, web based, to this current phase of social enterprise apps or social business solutions, vendors who wait to late to invest will relegate themselves to the has-been pile of vendor companies who failed to make it.  (e.g. Burroughs, Wang, Control Data, MSA, McCormack and Dodge, etc.).  Success and survival requires a software vendor to deliver across the 10 elements of Social Enterprise Apps in the next 2 to 3 years.

Quick Facts: Epicor Software

Location: HQ in Irvine, CA, globally located in 50 countries

Founded: 1984

Revenues: FY 2008 $495M

Employees: 2,800

Customers: 22,000

Your POV

Are you on Epicor 9?  In the midst of a vendor selection for a mid-market ERP solution?  Any problems and issues?  Let us know how to assist or please post or send on your comments to rwang0 (at) gmail (dot) com or r (at) altimetergroup (dot) com and we’ll keep your anonymity.

Copyright © 2009 R Wang. All rights reserved.