Software vendors face significant decisions in the next 6 to 12 months on how to respond to the economic downturn. Anxious shareholders and slipping quarterly forecasts may lead vendors to ignore their implied vendor customer contracts. This “implied contract” is the inherent trust a customer has with their vendor to do the right thing. It’s a trust that the customer placed with the vendor when they moved from custom apps to packaged software. This is important for two main reasons:
- Crisis of confidence among consumer industries will spread to B2B. Why is this important? According to the latest BBB/Gallup Trust in Business Index Survey, almost half (47%) of those surveyed say that “they have some, very little or no trust at all with the companies they do business with in everyday life.” Moreover the trust in businesses, for 13 of 15 industries measured, has fallen 14% during the last 7-month period. The survey and index, commissioned by the BBB and conducted by Gallup, measures consumer trust in businesses they regularly deal with. Growing lack of trust with every day businesses will eventually spill over to other business relationships such as technology vendors.
- Vendors who squeeze customers during the down turn will breed mistrust. As economic conditions worsen, software vendors often find themselves faced with margin pressures that eventually lead to cuts (in order of priority) in marketing, back office, customer service, sales, and R&D. Efficiency efforts often result in short term gains as management finds ways to be more efficient and improve their processes. Unfortunately, some vendors will go too far, leading to poor customer service, aggressive sales forces, and stagnating product lines. This often results in angry but locked in customers who will defect at the first opportunity during the next economic recovery. But the underlying issue here is trust. Does the customer currently trust their software vendor to do the right thing?
Software Vendors Can Take Proactive Measures To Improve Trust During Economic Uncertainty
So the real question – Will software vendors take a longer term view to find ways to both reduce expenses and improve how they treat their customers while delivering new innovation. At first, this may sound like a paradox, but unlike industries such as financial services and retail, high tech companies have not run out of cash. In fact, lessons learned from previous boom and bust cycles have taught them to hoard cash for rainy days or acquisitions. Most software vendors who survived the last economic rout socked away healthy levels of cash on hand. The real issue – convincing nervous shareholders that they need to reinvest a greater percentage of revenue back into areas such as service and R&D during the downturn so that they are able to capitalize during the next economic boom cycle.
5 Stakeholder Focused Strategies Can Be Funded Through Maintenance and Support Fees
Where would the money come from? Maintenance and support fees represent the most logical source. Recent conversations with insiders estimate the profitability of maintenance and support fees at up to 85% of the fees for products in the third year or greater in maturity. Further, most support organizations privately admit that not enough of the fees actually go back into the support organization, let alone new product development. Vendors could quickly earn customer trust by providing transparency as to where those monies are being allocated. Five steps that would improve ownership experiences and improve trust include:
- Lowering the overall cost of ownership. Customers seek rapid implementation methodologies, richer admin tools, and lower cost access to skilled resources. Cost of maintenance for established products should drop over time, not increase because customers also gain greater proficiency and can leverage self service help tools. Customers seek a reduction in the complexity, cost, and time required to upgrade products.
The outcome - efficiency efforts will leave money on the table for innovation and new projects. - Delivering hybrid deployment options. With SaaS adoption doubling every year and potentially increasing during the down turn, today’s products and solutions should support multiple deployment options. Customers may choose hybrid options that require seamless integration among on-premise, hosting, and SaaS models.
The outcome – choice will keep customers from feeling locked in. - Increasing the pace of innovation. By reinvesting more maintenance dollars into the product, vendors can better meet industry specific and customer specific enhancement requests. Inclusion of customers in the design process of future releases, improves the relationship and provides a tangible value to the maintenance dollar.
The outcome - rapid delivery of such requirements will build long term trust of how the customer’s maintenance monies are deployed. - Supporting greater heterogeneity. Vendors need to deliver on the promise of SOA and web services. Customer have sought improved integration from this next generation of architecture. The intent is to connect legacy systems and support best of breed vendors.
The outcome -Any action to improve the capability to integrate with other systems will improve value. - Orchestrating value in partner ecosystems. The larger vendors have the opportunity to show how their ecosystem partners can also provide a complete solution that support regulatory compliance and operational efficiency business drivers. Smaller vendors can identify synergies with partners to build ad hoc and eventually mutual partnerships.
The outcome – customers will see the value in how ecosystems can bring new solutions to life.
The bottom line.
The most valuable commodity in this economy and in business relationships is trust. The current downturn in the economy has been exacerbated by a deterioration in trust and a lack of any one party to improve trust and accountability. Software vendors have this opportunity to take their position of strength and demonstrate how they can provide customers value during a down turn. In doing so, they will help their customers succeed and earn customer loyalty and good will when the economy picks up.
Your POV.
If you’re a vendor, what’s missing? Will you be able to convince your board and management? For customers, what else are you looking for from your vendor? What will breed greater trust? Post a comment or drop me a line at rwang0@gmail.com.
Copyright © 2008 R Wang. All rights reserved.

15 Comments »
I would like to add one more: Increase customer intimacy. Listening to your customers, being approachable and ‘do as you promise’, may seem as hygiene factors in a vendor-customer relationship, but as I’ve experienced it is something that’s definately worthwhile to analyze for your own company.
Ronald,
Very good points. this is a big part. gotta love the blog, great input into future reports!
Ray
When our BI vendor came down hard on contract licensing this year, we fired them. The arrogance of the vendors es too much. They think they can dictate pricing and treat us poorly. The problem is they are trying to pay for their acquisitions. That’s their problemo not ours.
[...] Group Executive Network in making some progress on the topic of maintenance fees and improving the vendor-client commitment show how publicity and impact can shape influence. The key is for user groups to leverage the [...]
[...] issues in this entire controversy. Forrester’s Ray Wang has been stressing the importance of restoring the vendor-customer relationship through this whole affair. Similarly, analyst Josh Greenbaum pointed this dilemma out months ago in [...]
[...] An Enterprise Software Licensee’s Bill Of Rights Gives Users A Platform to Build a Win-Win Client Vendor Relationship [...]
[...] help to weed out dead wood and under performers. They also act as the catalyst for the kind of vendor/customer partnership envisaged by Ray Wang, Forrester [...]
[...] In any case, this is welcomed news and provides a hard fought win-win for the customer and the vendor-client relationship. Congratulations go out to SUGEN and SAP for coming to a common ground. The only thing left in the [...]
Totally agree with you about trust. Commonly, in B2B market it’s one of the most important factors considered while making decision about partnership.
Tnx for the article, took some notes for myself.
The main reasons why customers have so little trust in vendors im my opinion are:
They use agressive, commision based sales people who have little knowledge about the product they are selling and little respect for the client.
The support sucks or is non-existent.
The billing is outsourced to some other company, so if there is a problem, no one wants to be responsible. Simply, they sell and run.
Joe – a very good point. how vendors treat customers across each touch point from marketing, sales, to service impacts their reputation and perception. Billing is one that’s often overlooked. Any other ones out there? – Ray
I think the good communication with customer and customer intimacy plays an importan role to develop the strong vendor-customer relationship.
Aalinaeden – yes. two way communications must always be in place for effective communications. – Ray
[...] among these BPO companies and their clients. These cases demonstrate the role of transparency, mutual trust and genuine interest in mutual business success in minimizing the impact of financial disputes. [...]
Fantastic post! I agree that the most precious commodity that a software vendor has right now is trust. I have a very similar blog entry which covers the same topic if you’re interested in reading my take on the subject. Cheers! http://integrant.com/insights/vendor-client-responsibility
Leave a comment